Prognostic Role of Residual Thrombus Burden Following Thrombectomy: Insights From the TOTAL Trial

Author:

Alkhalil Mohammad123ORCID,Kuzemczak Michał145ORCID,Zhao Robin6,Kavvouras Charalampos1,Cantor Warren J.7,Overgaard Christopher B.7,Lavi Shahar8,Sharma Vinoda9,Chowdhary Saqib10,Stanković Goran11ORCID,Kedev Saško12,Bernat Ivo13ORCID,Bhindi Ravinay14,Sheth Tej6,Niemela Kari15,Jolly Sanjit S.6ORCID,Džavík Vladimír1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Canada (M.A., M.K., C.K., V.D.).

2. Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (M.A.).

3. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom (M.A.).

4. Division of Emergency Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland (M.K.).

5. Department of Invasive Cardiology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland (M.K.).

6. Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (R.Z., T.S., S.S.J.).

7. Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto and Southlake Regional Health Centre, Canada (W.J.C., C.B.O.).

8. London Health Sciences Centre, Canada (S.L.).

9. Cardiology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom (V.S.).

10. Cardiology Department, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (S.C.).

11. Department of Cardiology, University of Belgrade, Serbia (G.S.).

12. University Clinic of Cardiology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia (S.K.).

13. University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Czech Republic (I.B.).

14. Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia (R.B.).

15. Heart Hospital, Tampere, Finland (K.N.).

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether more effective forms of thrombus removal than current aspiration catheters would lead to improved outcomes. We sought to evaluate the prognostic role of residual thrombus burden (rTB), after manual thrombectomy, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with routine manual thrombectomy in the TOTAL trial (Thrombectomy Versus PCI Alone). Methods: This is a single-arm analysis of patients from the TOTAL trial who underwent routine manual aspiration thrombectomy. The rTB was quantified by an angiographic core laboratory using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria and validated using existing optical coherent tomography data. Large rTB was defined as grade ≥3. The primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening heart failure within 180 days. Results: Of 5033 patients randomized to routine thrombectomy, 2869 patients had quantifiable rTB (1014 [35%] had large rTB). Patients with large rTB were more likely to have hypertension, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, myocardial infarction, or Killip class III on presentation but less likely to have Killip class I. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with large rTB, even after adjustment for known risk predictors (8.6% versus 4.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.34–2.48]). These patients also had a higher risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.13–2.95]), cardiogenic shock (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.08–3.76]), and heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.02–2.96]) but not myocardial infarction or stroke. Conclusions: Large rTB is a common finding in primary percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death. Future technologies offering better thrombus removal than current devices may decrease or even eliminate the risk associated with rTB. This, potentially, can turn into a strategic option to be studied in clinical trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01149044.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3