Five-Year Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Bare-Metal Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents

Author:

Gomez-Lara Josep1,Brugaletta Salvatore1,Jacobi Francisco1,Ortega-Paz Luis1,Ñato Marcos1,Roura Gerard1,Romaguera Rafael1,Ferreiro Jose-Luis1,Teruel Luis1,Gracida Montserrat1,Martin-Yuste Victoria1,Freixa Xavier1,Masotti Monica1,Gomez-Hospital Joan-Antoni1,Sabate Manel1,Cequier Angel1

Affiliation:

1. From the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d’ Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, L’ Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (J.G.-L., F.J., M.Ñ., G.R., R.R., J.-L.F., L.T., M.G., J.-A.G.-H., A.C.); and Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Spain (S.B., L.O.-P., V.M.-Y., X.F., M.M., M.S.).

Abstract

Background— The main causes of late (>1 month) stent thrombosis (ST) are stent uncoverage, malapposition, and neoatherosclerosis. First-generation drug-eluting stents were associated with higher rate of late ST compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), especially in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) have shown similar rate of late ST than BMS. The aims of the study are to compare the ratio of uncovered to total struts per cross-section ≥30% and other optical coherence tomographic findings associated with ST between EES and BMS in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction at 5 years. Methods and Results— One hundred and sixty-nine consecutive event-free patients of the randomized EXAMINATION study (A Clinical Evaluation of Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stents in the Treatment of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) were screened for optical coherence tomographic imaging at 5 years. Patients with target vessel–related events or life-threatening comorbidities were excluded. Finally, 64 patients (32 EES and 32 BMS) underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging. At 5 years, uncovered struts (4.1% versus 1.0%; P <0.01), length of uncoverage (3.4 versus 1.4 mm; P =0.02), and ratio of uncovered to total struts per cross-section ≥30% (35.5% versus 9.7%; P =0.02) were larger with EES than that with BMS. Malapposed struts (1.2% versus 0.3%; P =0.02) and malapposition length (1.3 versus 0.4 mm; P =0.06) were also larger with EES. Neoatherosclerotic plaques (16.1% versus 25.8%; P =0.35) and macrophage accumulations (19.4% versus 48.4%; P =0.02) were numerically more frequent with BMS. Conclusions— Despite substantial dropout of patients, the healing pattern in event-free ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients differs between EES and BMS at 5 years. EES presented with larger amount of uncovered and malapposed struts and similar rate of neoatherosclerosis as compared with BMS. The clinical relevance of these findings warrants longer follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00828087.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3