Value of Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF Score) in Assessing Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the ‘All-Comers' LEADERS Trial

Author:

Wykrzykowska Joanna J.1,Garg Scot1,Onuma Yoshinobu1,de Vries Ton1,Goedhart Dick1,Morel Marie-Angele1,van Es Gerrit-Anne1,Buszman Pawel1,Linke Axel1,Ischinger Thomas1,Klauss Volker1,Corti Roberto1,Eberli Franz1,Wijns William1,Morice Marie-Claude1,di Mario Carlo1,van Geuns Robert Jan1,Juni Peter1,Windecker Stephan1,Serruys Patrick W.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Interventional Cardiology (J.J.W., S.G., Y.O., R.J.v.G., P.W.S.), Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, and Cardialysis BV (T.v.D., D.G., M.-A.M., G.-A.v.E.), Rotterdam, Netherlands; Medical University of Silesia (P.B.), Katowice, Poland; Herzzentrum Leipzig (A.L.), Leipzig, Germany; Department of Cardiology (T.I.), Hospital Bogenhausen, and Department of Cardiology (V.K.), University Hospital Munich (Innenstadt), Munich, Germany; Department of Cardiology (R.C., F.E.), University Hospital...

Abstract

Background— The age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score (age/left ventricular ejection fraction+1 if creatinine >2.0 mg/dL) has been established as an effective predictor of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery; however, its utility in “all-comer” patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is yet unexplored. Methods and Results— The ACEF score was calculated for 1208 of the 1707 patients enrolled in the LEADERS trial. Post hoc analysis was performed by stratifying clinical outcomes at the 1-year follow-up according to ACEF score tertiles: ACEF low ≤1.0225, 1.0225< ACEF mid ≤1.277, and ACEF high >1.277. At 1-year follow-up, there was a significantly lower number of patients with major adverse cardiac event–free survival in the highest tertile of the ACEF score (ACEF low =92.1%, ACEF mid =89.5%, and ACEF high =86.1%; P =0.0218). Cardiac death was less frequent in ACEF low than in ACEF mid and ACEF high (0.7% vs 2.2% vs 4.5%; hazard ratio=2.22, P =0.002) patients. Rates of myocardial infarction were significantly higher in patients with a high ACEF score (6.7% for ACEF high vs 5.2% for ACEF mid and 2.5% for ACEF low ; hazard ratio=1.6, P =0.006). Clinically driven target-vessel revascularization also tended to be higher in the ACEF high group, but the difference among the 3 groups did not reach statistical significance. The rate of composite definite, possible, and probable stent thrombosis was also higher in the ACEF high group (ACEF low =1.2%, ACEF mid =3.5%, and ACEF high =6.2%; hazard ratio=2.04, P <0.001). Conclusions— ACEF score may be a simple way to stratify risk of events in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention with respect to mortality and risk of myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00389220.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3