Lability of arterial pressure after baroreceptor denervation is not pressure dependent.

Author:

Jacob H J1,Alper R H1,Brody M J1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

Abstract

The mechanisms of increased arterial pressure lability after sinoaortic deafferentation remain unknown. We have shown previously in rats with chronic sinoaortic deafferentation (7-14 days after sinoaortic deafferentation) that ganglionic blockade significantly reduced mean arterial pressure and arterial pressure lability. The present study investigated the possibility that lability is related to the level of arterial pressure. Rats were instrumented chronically and heart rate and mean arterial pressure were sampled every 5 seconds in the conscious, freely moving state. Graded sustained increases in pressure (+10 to +82 mm Hg) produced by constant infusion of angiotensin II, phenylephrine, or vasopressin did not affect lability (standard deviation of 30-minute sampling period); whereas, graded hypotension (-10 to -70 mm Hg) produced by infusions of adenosine, nitroprusside, or nisoldipine appeared to reduce lability. Analysis of covariance and orthogonal polynomial curve fitting demonstrated a significant correlation between the decrease in mean arterial pressure and the decrease in lability produced by nisoldipine but not by adenosine or nitroprusside. Lability does not appear to be solely dependent on the level of arterial pressure because lability was reduced by adenosine when pressure was maintained at control levels by simultaneous infusion of phenylephrine. We conclude that 1) arterial pressure lability is not influenced by elevation of arterial pressure but can be reduced when pressure is lowered by certain vasodilators and 2) pressure alone does not appear to be the major determinant of lability because it can be attenuated by vascular smooth muscle relaxants even when pressure is maintained.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3