Use of Percutaneous Atrioseptotosmy for Left Heart Decompression During Veno‐Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: An Observational Study

Author:

Delmas Clément12ORCID,Vallee Luigi3ORCID,Bouisset Frédéric2,Porterie Jean4,Biendel Caroline12,Lairez Olivier2ORCID,Crognier Laure3,Marcheix Bertrand4,Conil Jean‐Marie3ORCID,Maury Philippe2ORCID,Minville Vincent3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Intensive Cardiac Care Unit Cardiology Department Rangueil University Toulouse France

2. Cardiology Department Rangueil University Hospital Toulouse France

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Perioperative Medicine Rangueil University Hospital Toulouse France

4. Cardiovascular Surgery Department Rangueil University Hospital Toulouse France

Abstract

Background Left ventricular overload is frequent under veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which is associated with a worsening of the prognosis of these patients. Several left heart decompression (LHD) techniques exist. However, there is no consensus on their timing and type. We aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing LHD and to compare percutaneous atrioseptostomy (PA) to other LHD techniques. Methods and Results Retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive and prospectively collected patients supported by veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock between January 2015 and April 2018, with a 90‐day follow‐up in our tertiary center. Patients were divided according to the presence of LHD, and then according to its type (PA versus others). Thirty‐nine percent (n=63) of our patients (n=163) required an LHD. Patients with LHD had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, more ischemic cardiomyopathy, and no drug intoxication‐associated cardiogenic shock. PA was frequently used for LHD (41% of first‐line and 57% of second‐line LHD). PA appears safe and fast to realize (6.3 [interquartile range, 5.8–10] minutes) under fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance, with no acute complications. PA was associated with fewer neurological complications (12% versus 38%, P =0.02), no need to insert a second LHD (0% versus 19%, P =0.04), and higher 90‐day survival compared with other techniques (42% versus 19%, log‐rank test P =0.02), despite more sepsis (96% versus 73%, P =0.02) and blood transfusions (13.5% versus 7%, P =0.01). Multivariate analysis confirms the association between PA and 90‐day survival (hazard ratio, 2.53 [1.18–5.45], P =0.019). Conclusions LHD was frequently used for patients supported with veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially in cases of ischemic cardiomyopathy and low left ventricular ejection fraction. PA seems to be a safe and efficient LHD technique associated with greater mid‐term survival justifying the pursuit of research on this topic.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3