Waitlist Outcomes in Candidates With Rare Causes of Heart Failure After Implementation of the 2018 French Heart Allocation Scheme

Author:

Legeai Camille1ORCID,Coutance Guillaume23ORCID,Cantrelle Christelle1ORCID,Jasseron Carine1ORCID,Para Marylou4ORCID,Sebbag Laurent5,Battistella Pascal6,Kerbaul François1,Dorent Richard1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint Denis La Plaine Cedex, France (C.L., C.C., C.J., F.K., R.D.).

2. Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Cardiology Institute, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital (G.C.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University Medical School, France.

3. University of Paris, INSERM UMR 970, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, France (G.C.).

4. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bichat Hospital (M.P.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University Medical School, France.

5. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France (L.S.).

6. Department of Cardiology, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France (P.B.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2018, an algorithm-based allocation system for heart transplantation (HT) was implemented in France. Its effect on access to HT of patients with rare causes of heart failure (HF) has not been assessed. METHODS: In this national study, including adults listed for HT between 2018 and 2020, we analyzed waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of candidates with rare causes of HF (restrictive cardiomyopathy [RCM], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and congenital heart disease). The primary end point was death on the waitlist or delisting for clinical deterioration. Secondary end points included access to HT and posttransplant mortality. The cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality estimated with competing risk analysis and incidence of transplantation were compared between diagnosis groups. The association of HF cause with outcomes was determined by Fine-Gray or Cox models. RESULTS: Overall, 1604 candidates were listed for HT. At 1 year postlisting, 175 patients met the primary end point and 1040 underwent HT. Candidates listed for rare causes of HF significantly differed in baseline characteristics and had more frequent score exceptions compared with other cardiomyopathies (31.3%, 32.0%, 36.4%, and 16.7% for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, RCM, congenital heart disease, and other cardiomyopathies). The cumulative incidence of death on the waitlist and probability of HT were similar between diagnosis groups ( P =0.17 and 0.40, respectively). The adjusted risk of death or delisting for clinical deterioration did not significantly differ between candidates with rare and common causes of HF (subdistribution hazard ratio (HR): hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.19–1.38]; P =0.18; RCM, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.42–2.58]; P =0.94; congenital heart disease, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.78–4.26]; P =0.17). Similarly, the access to HT did not significantly differ between causes of HF (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92–1.51]; P =0.19; RCM: HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.90–1.58]; P =0.23; congenital heart disease: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.53–1.09]; P =0.14). RCM was an independent risk factor for 1-year posttransplant mortality (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.06–4.24]; P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows equitable waitlist outcomes among HT candidates whatever the indication for transplantation with the new French allocation scheme.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3