Mortality Implications of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Secondary Prevention Patients: Contrasting Mortality in Primary Prevention Patients From a Prospective Population‐Based Registry

Author:

Almehmadi Fahad1,Porta‐Sánchez Andreu213,Ha Andrew C. T.21,Fischer Hadas D.4,Wang Xuesong4,Austin Peter C.4,Lee Douglas S.21,Nanthakumar Kumaraswamy21

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Canada

2. Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Department de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain

4. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Background We sought to examine the mortality impact of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator ( ICD ) therapy between patients who received ICD for primary versus secondary prevention purposes. Methods and Results From a prospective, population‐based registry, we identified 7020 patients who underwent de novo ICD implantation between February 2007 and May 2012 in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and analyzed the mortality impact of first appropriate ICD therapy (shock and antitachycardia pacing [ ATP ]) as a time‐varying covariate. There were 1929 (27.5%) patients who received ICD s for secondary prevention purposes. The median follow‐up period was 5.02 years. Compared with those with secondary prevention ICD s, patients with primary prevention ICD s had more medical comorbidities, and lower ejection fraction. Patients who experienced appropriate ICD shock or ATP had greater risk of death compared with those who did not, irrespective of implant indication. In the primary prevention group, the adjusted hazard ratios of death for appropriate shock and ATP were 2.00 (95% CI : 1.72–2.33) and 1.73 (95% CI : 1.52–1.97), respectively. In the secondary prevention group, the adjusted hazard ratios of death for appropriate ICD shock and ATP were 1.46 (95% CI : 1.20–1.77) and 1.38 (95% CI : 1.16–1.64), respectively. Conclusions Despite having a more favorable clinical profile, occurrence of appropriate ICD shock or ATP in patients with secondary prevention ICD s was associated with similar magnitudes of mortality risk as those with primary prevention ICD s. A heightened degree of care is warranted for all patients who experience appropriate ICD shock or ATP therapy.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3