Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Pawade Tania A.1,Doris Mhairi K.1,Bing Rong1ORCID,White Audrey C.1,Forsyth Laura2ORCID,Evans Emily3,Graham Catriona3,Williams Michelle C.1ORCID,van Beek Edwin J.R.4ORCID,Fletcher Alison4,Adamson Philip D.15,Andrews Jack P.M.1,Cartlidge Timothy R.G.1,Jenkins William S.A.1ORCID,Syed Maaz1,Fujisawa Takeshi1,Lucatelli Christophe4,Fraser William6,Ralston Stuart H.7,Boon Nicholas1,Prendergast Bernard8,Newby David E.1ORCID,Dweck Marc R.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science (T.A.P., M.K.D., R.B., A.C.W., M.C.W., P.D.A., J.P.M.A., T.R.G.C., W.S.A.J., M.S., T.F., N.B., D.E.N., M.R.D.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

2. Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit (L.F.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

3. Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility (E.E., C.G.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

4. Edinburgh Imaging (E.J.R.v.B., A.F., C.L.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

5. Christchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago, New Zealand (P.D.A.).

6. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom (W.F.).

7. Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine (S.H.R.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

8. King’s College London, United Kingdom (B.P.).

Abstract

Background: Valvular calcification is central to the pathogenesis and progression of aortic stenosis, with preclinical and observational studies suggesting that bone turnover and osteoblastic differentiation of valvular interstitial cells are important contributory mechanisms. We aimed to establish whether inhibition of these pathways with denosumab or alendronic acid could reduce disease progression in aortic stenosis. Methods: In a single-center, parallel group, double-blind randomized controlled trial, patients >50 years of age with calcific aortic stenosis (peak aortic jet velocity >2.5 m/s) were randomized 2:1:2:1 to denosumab (60 mg every 6 months), placebo injection, alendronic acid (70 mg once weekly), or placebo capsule. Participants underwent serial assessments with Doppler echocardiography, computed tomography aortic valve calcium scoring, and 18 F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography and computed tomography. The primary end point was the calculated 24-month change in aortic valve calcium score. Results: A total of 150 patients (mean age, 72±8 years; 21% women) with calcific aortic stenosis (peak aortic jet velocity, 3.36 m/s [2.93–3.82 m/s]; aortic valve calcium score, 1152 AU [655–2065 AU]) were randomized and received the allocated trial intervention: denosumab (n=49), alendronic acid (n=51), and placebo (injection n=25, capsule n=25; pooled for analysis). Serum C-terminal telopeptide, a measure of bone turnover, halved from baseline to 6 months with denosumab (0.23 [0.18–0.33 µg/L] to 0.11 µg/L [0.08–0.17 µg/L]) and alendronic acid (0.20 [0.14–0.28 µg/L] to 0.09 µg/L [0.08–0.13 µg/L]) but was unchanged with placebo (0.23 [0.17–0.30 µg/L] to 0.26 µg/L [0.16–0.31 µg/L]). There were no differences in 24-month change in aortic valve calcium score between denosumab and placebo (343 [198–804 AU] versus 354 AU [76–675 AU]; P=0.41) or alendronic acid and placebo (326 [138–813 AU] versus 354 AU [76–675 AU]; P =0.49). Similarly, there were no differences in change in peak aortic jet velocity or 18 F-sodium fluoride aortic valve uptake. Conclusions: Neither denosumab nor alendronic acid affected progression of aortic valve calcification in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Alternative pathways and mechanisms need to be explored to identify disease-modifying therapies for the growing population of patients with this potentially fatal condition. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02132026.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 82 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3