Value of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support

Author:

Saxena Abhinav1ORCID,Garan A. Reshad2,Kapur Navin K.3,O’Neill William W.4,Lindenfeld JoAnn5,Pinney Sean P.6,Uriel Nir7,Burkhoff Daniel8,Kern Morton9

Affiliation:

1. Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY (A.S.).

2. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (A.R.G.).

3. Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (N.K.K.).

4. Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.).

5. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (J.L.).

6. Zena and Michael Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (S.P.P.).

7. Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (N.U.).

8. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York (D.B.).

9. University of California Irvine and VA Long Beach Healthcare System (M.K.).

Abstract

The recent widespread availability and use of mechanical circulatory support is transforming the management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock (CS). Clinical decision-making regarding the optimization of therapies for patients with CS can be guided effectively by hemodynamic monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). Because several studies regarding the benefit of PACs are ambiguous, the use of PACs is variable among clinicians treating patients with CS. More notable is that PAC use has not been studied as part of a randomized, controlled trial in patients with CS with or without mechanical circulatory support. Standardized approaches to hemodynamic monitoring in these patients can improve decision-making and outcomes. In this review, we summarize the hemodynamics of CS and mechanical circulatory support with PAC-derived measurements, and provide a compelling rationale for the use of PAC monitoring in patients with CS receiving mechanical circulatory support.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3