Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: PULSED AF Pivotal Trial

Author:

Verma Atul1ORCID,Haines David E.2,Boersma Lucas V.3ORCID,Sood Nitesh4,Natale Andrea5ORCID,Marchlinski Francis E.6ORCID,Calkins Hugh7ORCID,Sanders Prashanthan8ORCID,Packer Douglas L.9ORCID,Kuck Karl-Heinz10ORCID,Hindricks Gerhard11,Onal Birce12ORCID,Cerkvenik Jeffrey12,Tada Hiroshi13,DeLurgio David B.14,

Affiliation:

1. McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (A.V.).

2. Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI (D.E.H.).

3. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands (L.V.B.).

4. Southcoast Health Center, Fall River, MA (N.S.).

5. Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin (A.N.).

6. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (F.E.M.).

7. Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (H.C.).

8. University of Adelaide & Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia (P.S.).

9. Mayo Clinic–St. Mary’s Hospital, Rochester, MN (D.L.P.).

10. LANS Cardio, Hamburg, Germany (K.-H.K.).

11. Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Germany (G.H.).

12. Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN (B.O., J.C.).

13. University of Fukui, Japan (H.T.).

14. Emory Heart & Vascular Center at St. Joseph’s, Atlanta, GA (D.B.D.).

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation uses electrical pulses to cause nonthermal irreversible electroporation and induce cardiac cell death. Pulsed field ablation may have effectiveness comparable to traditional catheter ablation while preventing thermally mediated complications. Methods: The PULSED AF pivotal study (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF) was a prospective, global, multicenter, nonrandomized, paired single-arm study in which patients with paroxysmal (n=150) or persistent (n=150) symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs were treated with pulsed field ablation. All patients were monitored for 1 year using weekly and symptomatic transtelephonic monitoring; 3-, 6-, and 12-month ECGs; and 6- and 12-month 24-hour Holter monitoring. The primary effectiveness end point was freedom from a composite of acute procedural failure, arrhythmia recurrence, or antiarrhythmic escalation through 12 months, excluding a 3-month blanking period to allow recovery from the procedure. The primary safety end point was freedom from a composite of serious procedure- and device-related adverse events. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate the primary end points. Results: Pulsed field ablation was shown to be effective at 1 year in 66.2% (95% CI, 57.9 to 73.2) of patients with paroxysmal AF and 55.1% (95% CI, 46.7 to 62.7) of patients with persistent AF. The primary safety end point occurred in 1 patient (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.1 to 4.6) in both the paroxysmal and persistent AF cohorts. Conclusions: PULSED AF demonstrated a low rate of primary safety adverse events (0.7%) and provided effectiveness consistent with established ablation technologies using a novel irreversible electroporation energy to treat patients with AF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04198701.

Funder

Medtronic

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 166 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pulse Field Ablation: The Electric Future of Cardiac Ablation;Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-10

2. Safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes of pulsed field ablation in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the PULSED AF trial;Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology;2024-09-07

3. Different Type of Ablation Procedures for Atrial Fibrillation;Atrial Fibrillation - Current Management and Practice [Working Title];2024-09-04

4. Pulsed Field Ablation: A Comprehensive Update;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-09-01

5. Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy;JACC: Advances;2024-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3