Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (I.A.R., J.G.M., R.S.B.) and Department of Cardiology (R.P.S., J.N.T.), University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.P.F., R.S.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility (P.N.), Birmingham, United Kingdom; and the Department of Clinical Biochemistry (P.G.) and Department of Anesthetics (P.T., D.G.), University Hospital...
Abstract
Background—
We assessed whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improves myocardial, renal, and lung protection after on-pump coronary surgery.
Methods and Results—
This was a single-center, prospective, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial. Patients, investigators, anesthetists, surgeons, and critical care teams were blinded to group allocation. Subjects received RIPC (or placebo) stimuli (×3 upper limb (or dummy arm), 5-minute cycles of 200 mm Hg cuff inflation/deflation) before aortic clamping. Anesthesia, perfusion, cardioplegia, and surgical techniques were standardized. The primary end point was 48-hour area under the curve (AUC) troponin T (cTnT) release. Secondary end points were 6-hour and peak cTnT, ECG changes, cardiac index, inotrope and vasoconstrictor use, renal dysfunction, and lung injury. Hospital survival was 99.4%. Comparing placebo and RIPC, median (interquartile range) AUC 48-hour cTnT (ng/mL
−1
/48 h
−1
); 28 (19, 39) versus 30 (22, 38), 6-hour cTnT (ng/mL
−1
); 0.93(0.59, 1.35) versus 1.01(0.72, 1.43), peak cTnT (ng/mL
−1
); 1.02 (0.74, 1.44) versus 1.04 (0.78, 1.51), de novo left bundle-branch block (4% versus 0%) and Q waves (5.3% versus 5.5%), serial cardiac indices, intraaortic balloon pump usage (8.5% versus 7.5%), inotrope (39% versus 50%) and vasoconstrictor usage (66% versus 64%) were not different. Dialysis requirement (1.2% versus 3.8%), peak creatinine (median [interquartile range], 1.2 mg/dL
−1
(1.1, 1.4) versus 1.2 (1.0, 1.4)), and AUC urinary albumin-creatinine ratios 69 (40, 112) versus 58 (32, 85) were not different. Intubation times; median (interquartile range), 937 minutes(766, 1402) versus 895(675, 1180), 6-hour; 278 (210, 338) versus 270 (218, 323) and 12-hour pO
2
:FiO
2
ratios 255 (195, 323) versus 263 (210, 308) were similar.
Conclusions—
In contrast to prior smaller studies, RIPC did not reduce troponin release, improve hemodynamics, or enhance renal or lung protection.
Clinical Trial Registration—
URL: http://www.ukcrn.org.uk. Unique identifier: 4659.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine