Sex Differences in the Effectiveness of Early Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Compared With Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain

Author:

Truong Quynh A.1,Hayden Douglas1,Woodard Pamela K.1,Kirby Ruth1,Chou Eric T.1,Nagurney John T.1,Wiviott Stephen D.1,Fleg Jerome L.1,Schoenfeld David A.1,Udelson James E.1,Hoffmann Udo1

Affiliation:

1. From the Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Division of Cardiology and Department of Radiology (Q.A.T., U.H.) and Emergency Department (J.T.N.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.H., D.A.S.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (P.K.W.); Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD...

Abstract

Background— We evaluate sex-based differences in the effectiveness of early cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and standard emergency department (ED) evaluation in patients with acute chest pain. Methods and Results— In the Rule-Out Myocardial Infarction With Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT)-II multicenter, controlled trial, we randomized 1000 patients (47% women) 40 to 74 years of age with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome to an early CCTA or standard ED evaluation. In this prespecified analysis, women in the CCTA arm had a greater reduction in length of stay, lower hospital admission rates, and lesser increased cumulative radiation dose than men in a comparison of ED strategies ( P for interaction ≤0.02). Although women had lower acute coronary syndrome rates than men (3% versus 12%; P <0.0001), sex differences in length of stay persisted after adjustment for baseline differences, including acute coronary syndrome rate ( P for interaction <0.03). Length of stay was similar between sexes with normal CCTA findings ( P =0.11). There was no missed acute coronary syndrome for either sex. No difference was observed in major adverse cardiac events between sexes and ED strategies ( P for interaction =0.39). Women had more normal CCTA examinations than men (58% versus 37%; P <0.0001), less obstructive coronary disease by CCTA (5% versus 17%; P =0.0001), but similar normalcy rates for functional testing ( P =0.65). Men in the CCTA arm had the highest rate of invasive coronary angiography (18%), whereas women had comparable low 5% rates regardless of ED strategy. Conclusions— This trial provides data supporting an early CCTA strategy as an attractive option in women presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. The findings may be explained by lower CAD prevalence and severity in women than men. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01084239.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3