Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients

Author:

Pibarot Philippe1ORCID,Salaun Erwan1,Dahou Abdellaziz2,Avenatti Eleonora2,Guzzetti Ezequiel1,Annabi Mohamed-Salah1,Toubal Oumhani1,Bernier Mathieu1,Beaudoin Jonathan1,Ong Géraldine3,Ternacle Julien1,Krapf Laura1,Thourani Vinod H.4,Makkar Raj5,Kodali Susheel K.6,Russo Mark7,Kapadia Samir R.8,Malaisrie S. Chris9,Cohen David J.10,Leipsic Jonathon11,Blanke Philipp11,Williams Mathew R.12,McCabe James M.13,Brown David L.14,Babaliaros Vasilis15,Goldman Scott16,Szeto Wilson Y.17,Généreux Philippe18,Pershad Ashish19,Alu Maria C.26,Xu Ke20,Rogers Erin20,Webb John G.11,Smith Craig R.6,Mack Michael J.14,Leon Martin B.26,Hahn Rebecca T.26,

Affiliation:

1. Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Canada (P.P., E.S., E.G., M.-S.A., O.T., M.B., J.B., J.T., L.K.).

2. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.D., E.A., M.C.A., M.B.L., R.T.H.).

3. St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada (G.O.).

4. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA (V.H.T.).

5. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (R.M.).

6. Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York (S.K.K., M.C.A., C.R.S., M.B.L., R.T.H.).

7. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (M.R.).

8. Cleveland Clinic, OH (S.R.K.).

9. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (S.C.M.).

10. University of Missouri–Kansas City (D.J.C.).

11. St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (J.L., P.B., J.G.W.).

12. NYU–Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (M.R.W.).

13. University of Washington, Seattle (J.M.M.).

14. Baylor Scott & White Healthcare, Plano, TX (D.L.B., M.J.M.).

15. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (V.B.).

16. Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA (S.G.).

17. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (W.Y.S.).

18. Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, NJ (P.G.).

19. Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (A.P.).

20. Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA (K.X., E.R.).

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare echocardiographic findings in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: The PARTNER 3 trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) randomized 1000 patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk to undergo either transfemoral TAVR with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve or SAVR. Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained at baseline and at 30 days and 1 year after the procedure were analyzed by a consortium of 2 echocardiography core laboratories. Results: The percentage of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) was low and not statistically different between the TAVR and SAVR groups at 30 days (0.8% versus 0.2%; P =0.38). Mild AR was more frequent after TAVR than SAVR at 30 days (28.8% versus 4.2%; P <0.001). At 1 year, mean transvalvular gradient (13.7±5.6 versus 11.6±5.0 mm Hg; P =0.12) and aortic valve area (1.72±0.37 versus 1.76±0.42 cm 2 ; P =0.12) were similar in TAVR and SAVR. The percentage of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch at 30 days was low and similar between TAVR and SAVR (4.6 versus 6.3%; P =0.30). Valvulo-arterial impedance (Z va ), which reflects total left ventricular hemodynamic burden, was lower with TAVR than SAVR at 1 year (3.7±0.8 versus 3.9±0.9 mm Hg/mL/m 2 ; P <0.001). Tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion decreased and the percentage of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation increased from baseline to 1 year in SAVR but remained unchanged in TAVR. Irrespective of treatment arm, high Z va and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion, but not moderate to severe AR or severe prosthesis–patient mismatch, were associated with increased risk of the composite end point of mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year. Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk, TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve was associated with similar percentage of moderate or severe AR compared with SAVR but higher percentage of mild AR. Transprosthetic gradients, valve areas, percentage of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch, and left ventricular mass regression were similar in TAVR and SAVR. SAVR was associated with significant deterioration of right ventricular systolic function and greater tricuspid regurgitation, which persisted at 1 year. High Z va and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion were associated with worse outcome at 1 year whereas AR and severe prosthesis–patient mismatch were not. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02675114.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3