Genetic Testing for Long-QT Syndrome

Author:

Kapa Suraj1,Tester David J.1,Salisbury Benjamin A.1,Harris-Kerr Carole1,Pungliya Manish S.1,Alders Marielle1,Wilde Arthur A.M.1,Ackerman Michael J.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Medicine/Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (S.K., M.J.A.), Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics/Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory (D.J.T., M.J.A.), and Department of Pediatrics/Division of Pediatric Cardiology (M.J.A.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Clinical Genetics, PGxHealth, LLC, New Haven, Conn (B.A.S., C.H.-K.); Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc, New Haven, Conn (M.S.P.); and Departments of Clinical Genetics (M.A.) and...

Abstract

Background— Genetic testing for long-QT syndrome (LQTS) has diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Hundreds of causative mutations in 12 known LQTS-susceptibility genes have been identified. Genetic testing that includes the 3 most commonly mutated genes is available clinically. Distinguishing pathogenic mutations from innocuous rare variants is critical to the interpretation of test results. We sought to quantify the value of mutation type and gene/protein region in determining the probability of pathogenicity for mutations. Methods and Results— Type, frequency, and location of mutations across KCNQ1 (LQT1), KCNH2 (LQT2), and SCN5A (LQT3) were compared between 388 unrelated “definite” (clinical diagnostic score ≥4 and/or QTc ≥480 ms) cases of LQTS and >1300 healthy controls for each gene. From these data, estimated predictive values (percent of mutations found in definite cases that would cause LQTS) were determined according to mutation type and location. Mutations were 10 times more common in cases than controls (0.58 per case versus 0.06 per control). Missense mutations were the most common, accounting for 78%, 67%, and 89% of mutations in KCNQ1 , KCNH2 , and SCN5A in cases and >95% in controls. Nonmissense mutations have an estimated predictive value >99% regardless of location. In contrast, location appears to be critical for characterizing missense mutations. Relative frequency of missense mutations between cases and controls ranged from ≈1:1 in the SCN5A interdomain linker to infinity in the pore, transmembrane, and linker in KCNH2. These correspond to estimated predictive values ranging from 0% in the interdomain linker of SCN5A to 100% in the transmembrane/linker/pore regions of KCNH2. The estimated predictive value is also high in the linker, pore, transmembrane, and C terminus of KCNQ1 and the transmembrane/linker of SCN5A. Conclusions— Distinguishing pathogenic mutations from rare variants is of critical importance in the interpretation of genetic testing in LQTS. Mutation type, mutation location, and ethnic-specific background rates are critical factors in predicting the pathogenicity of novel mutations. Novel mutations in low-estimated predictive value regions such as the interdomain linker of SCN5A should be viewed as variants of uncertain significance and prompt further investigation to clarify the likelihood of disease causation. However, mutations in regions such as the transmembrane, linker, and pore of KCNQ1 and KCNH2 may be defined confidently as high-probability LQTS-causing mutations. These findings will have implications for other genetic disorders involving mutational analysis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. GeneTests. Medical Genetics Informational Resource (database online). Seattle Wash: University of Washington; 1995–2007. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/GeneTests/?db=GeneTests. Accessed October 1 2009.

2. The complexities of predictive genetic testing

3. Letting the Genome out of the Bottle — Will We Get Our Wish?

4. The long QT syndrome: Therapeutic implications of a genetic diagnosis

5. Linkage of a cardiac arrhythmia, the long QT syndrome, and the Harvey ras-1 gene

Cited by 305 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3