Author:
,Douglas Pamela S.,Khandheria Bijoy,Stainback Raymond F.,Weissman Neil J.,Peterson Eric D.,Hendel Robert C.,Stainback Raymond F.,Blaivas Michael,Des Prez Roger D.,Gillam Linda D.,Golash Terry,Hiratzka Loren F.,Kussmaul William G.,Labovitz Arthur J.,Lindenfeld JoAnn,Masoudi Frederick A.,Mayo Paul H.,Porembka David,Spertus John A.,Wann L. Samuel,Wiegers Susan E.,Brindis Ralph G.,Douglas Pamela S.,Hendel Robert C.,Patel Manesh R.,Peterson Eric D.,Wolk Michael J.,Allen Joseph M., ,
Abstract
The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) together with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriateness review for stress echocardiography. The review assessed the risks and benefits of stress echocardiography for several indications or clinical scenarios and scored them on a scale of 1 to 9 (based upon methodology developed by the ACCF to assess imaging appropriateness). The upper range (7 to 9) implies that the test is generally acceptable and is a reasonable approach, and the lower range (1 to 3) implies that the test is generally not acceptable and is not a reasonable approach. The midrange (4 to 6) indicates a clinical scenario for which the indication for a stress echocardiogram is uncertain. The indications for this review were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Use of stress echocardiography for risk assessment in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) was viewed favorably, while routine repeat testing and general screening in certain clinical scenarios were viewed less favorably. It is anticipated that these results will have a significant impact on physician decision making and performance, reimbursement policy, and will help guide future research.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
148 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献