Improving Hypertension Control in Diabetes Mellitus

Author:

Naik Aanand D.1,Kallen Michael A.1,Walder Annette1,Street Richard L.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies (A.D.N., A.W., R.L.S.), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Tex; Sections of Health Services Research (A.D.N., A.W., R.L.S.) and Geriatrics (A.D.N.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of General Internal Medicine (M.A.K.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; and Department of Communication (R.L.S.), Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex.

Abstract

Background— Communication between patients and clinicians using collaborative goals and treatment plans may overcome barriers to achieving hypertension control in routine diabetes mellitus care. We assessed the interrelation of patient–clinician communication factors to determine their independent associations with hypertension control in diabetes care. Methods and Results— We identified 566 older adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension at the DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston, Tex. Clinical and pharmacy data were collected, and a patient questionnaire was sent to all participants. A total of 212 individuals returned surveys. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of patient characteristics, self-management behaviors, and communication factors on hypertension control. Three communication factors had significant associations with hypertension control. Two factors, patients’ endorsement of a shared decision-making style (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.57) and proactive communication with one’s clinician about abnormal results of blood pressure self-monitoring (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.26), had direct, independent associations in multivariate regression. Path analysis was used to investigate the direct and indirect effects of communication factors and hypertension control. Decision-making style (β=0.20, P <0.01) and proactive communication (β=0.50, P <0.0001) again demonstrated direct effects on hypertension control. A third factor, clinicians’ use of collaborative communication when setting treatment goals, had a total effect on hypertension control of 0.16 ( P <0.05) through its direct effects on decision-making style (β=0.28, P <0.001) and proactive communication (β=0.22, P <0.01). Conclusions— Three communication factors were found to have significant associations with hypertension control. Patient–clinician communication that facilitates collaborative blood pressure goals and patients’ input related to the progress of treatment may improve rates of hypertension control in diabetes care independent of medication adherence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 151 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3