Forty-Year Shifting Distribution of Systolic Blood Pressure With Population Hypertension Treatment and Control

Author:

Lackland Daniel T.1ORCID,Howard Virginia J.2ORCID,Cushman Mary3ORCID,Oparil Suzanne4ORCID,Kissela Brett5,Safford Monika M.6,Kleindorfer Dawn O.7ORCID,McClure Leslie A.8,Howard George9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (D.T.L.).

2. Department of Epidemiology (V.J.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

3. Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington (M.C.).

4. Department of Medicine (S.O.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

5. Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, OH (B.K.).

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (M.M.S.).

7. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (D.O.K.).

8. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA (L.A.M.).

9. Department of Biostatistics (G.H.), School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Abstract

Background: Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control programs were initiated in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s. Whereas blood pressure (BP) control in the population and subsequent reduced hypertension-related disease risks have improved since the implementation of these interventions, it is unclear whether these BP changes can be generalized to diverse and high-risk populations. This report describes the 4-decade change in BP levels for the population in a high disease risk southeastern region of the United States. The objective is to determine the magnitude of the shift in systolic BP (SBP) among Blacks and Whites from the Southeast between 1960 and 2005 with the assessment of the unique population cohorts. Methods: A multicohort study design compared BPs from the CHS (Charleston Heart Study) and ECHS (Evans County Heart Study) in 1960 and the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) 4 decades later. The analyses included participants ≥45 years of age from CHS (n=1323), ECHS (n=1842), and REGARDS (n=6294) with the main outcome of SBP distribution. Results: Among Whites 45 to 54 years of age, the median SBP was 18 mm Hg (95% CI, 16–21 mm Hg) lower in 2005 than 1960. The median shift was a 45 mm Hg (95% CI, 37–51 mm Hg) decline for those ≥75 years of age. The shift was larger for Blacks, with median declines of 38 mm Hg (95% CI, 32–40 mm Hg) at 45 to 54 years of age and 50 mm Hg (95% CI, 33–60 mm Hg) for ages ≥75 years. The 95th percentile of SBP decreased 60 mm Hg for Whites and 70 mm Hg for Blacks. Conclusions: The results of the current analyses of the unique cohorts in the Southeast confirm the improvements in population SBP levels since 1960. This assessment provides new evidence of improvement in SBP, suggesting that strategies and programs implemented to improve hypertension treatment and control have been extraordinarily successful for both Blacks and Whites residing in a high-risk region of the United States. Severe BP elevations commonly observed in the 1960s have been nearly eliminated, with the current 75th percentile of BP generally less than the 25th percentile of BP in 1960.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Implementation of Hypertension Control Based on the Population;JAMA Network Open;2024-09-11

2. Sherman Lecture: Are We Aiming at the Correct Targets to Reduce Disparities in Stroke Mortality? Celebration, Reflection, and Redirection;Journal of the American Heart Association;2024-04-02

3. Black-white Differences in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Rates Among Young Adults with Ischemic Stroke;Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases;2022-08

4. New wrinkles in hypertension management 2022;Current Opinion in Cardiology;2022-06-28

5. Ethnic differences in arterial stiffness and central aortic hemodynamics;Textbook of Arterial Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Health and Disease;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3