Mortality Assessment of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Author:

Gray William A.1,Jaff Michael R.2,Parikh Sahil A.3,Ansel Gary M.4,Brodmann Marianne5,Krishnan Prakash6,Razavi Mahmood K.7,Vermassen Frank8,Zeller Thomas9,White Roseann10,Ouriel Kenneth10,Adelman Mark A.10,Lyden Sean P.11

Affiliation:

1. Lankenau Heart Institute/Main Line Health, Philadelphia, PA (W.A.G.).

2. Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.).

3. New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center (S.A.P.).

4. OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Columbus (G.M.A.).

5. Medical University Graz, Austria (M.B.).

6. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York (P.K.).

7. St. Joseph Health, Orange, CA (M.K.R.).

8. Ghent University Hospital, Belgium (F.V.).

9. Universitäts – Herzzentrum, Freiburg, Germany (T.Z.).

10. Syntactx, New York (R.W., K.O., M.A.A.).

11. Cleveland Clinic, OH (S.P.L.).

Abstract

Background: A recent summary-level meta-analysis comprising randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of femoropopliteal paclitaxel-coated balloon and stent intervention identified excess late mortality in the paclitaxel-treated patients. Methods: We evaluated the safety of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) for femoropopliteal artery disease with an independently performed meta-analysis of patient-level data from all patients in the Stellarex femoropopliteal clinical program. To compare mortality after DCB or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), we aggregated data from 2 RCTs comprising 419 patients treated with DCB and 170 patients treated with PTA. In an additional analysis, data were aggregated from 6 poolable Stellarex DCB studies (2 RCTs, 3 single-arm studies, and 1 registry). All serious adverse events including deaths were adjudicated by a blinded, third-party, independent Clinical Events Committee. Kaplan–Meier estimates in the RCTs were compared with restricted mean survival time. Predictors of death were assessed with hazard ratios (HRs) and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the patients treated with DCB and PTA in the pooled RCT analysis, with the exception that the DCB cohort was younger (67.4±9.7 versus 69.4±9.4 years, P =0.02), smoked more frequently (86.6% versus 78.8%, P =0.02), and were less often treated for recurrent lesions (8.8% versus 14.7%, P =0.04). In the RCTs, patients treated with DCB had all-cause mortality rates that were not different from those of patients treated with PTA (Kaplan–Meier estimates 1.8±0.7% versus 1.3±0.9%, 6.5±1.2% versus 5.9±1.9%, and 9.3±1.5% versus 9.9±2.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, P =0.86). All-cause mortality rates were similar in a 1906-patient pooled nonrandomized DCB data set (Kaplan–Meier estimates of 2.1%, 4.9%, and 7.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). Clinical Events Committee–adjudicated causes of death were balanced between the DCB and PTA cohorts. Multivariable Cox modeling identified age (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04–1.08; P <0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01–2.00; P =0.04), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.12–3.16; P =0.02), and renal insufficiency (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.33–3.01; P <0.001) as predictors of mortality. Paclitaxel exposure was unrelated to mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.98–1.10; P =0.23). Conclusions: The mortality rates for patients treated with the DCB and uncoated PTA were indistinguishable over 3-year follow-up. Additional patient-level, adequately powered meta-analyses with larger RCT data sets will be needed to confirm the generalizability of these findings. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT02110524, NCT01858363, NCT01858428, NCT03421561, NCT01912937, NCT01927068, and NCT02769273.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3