Multisite Randomized Trial of a Single-Session Versus Multisession Literacy-Sensitive Self-Care Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure

Author:

DeWalt Darren A.1,Schillinger Dean1,Ruo Bernice1,Bibbins-Domingo Kirsten1,Baker David W.1,Holmes George M.1,Weinberger Morris1,Macabasco-O'Connell Aurelia1,Broucksou Kimberly1,Hawk Victoria1,Grady Kathleen L.1,Erman Brian1,Sueta Carla A.1,Chang Patricia P.1,Cene Crystal Wiley1,Wu Jia-Rong1,Jones Christine D.1,Pignone Michael1

Affiliation:

1. From the Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology (D.A.D., V.H., C.W.C., M.P.), The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (D.A.D., G.M.H., K.B., V.H., B.E., C.W.C., M.P.), Department of Health Policy and Management (G.M.H., M.W.), Division of Cardiology (C.A.S., P.C.P.), The School of Nursing (J.-R.W.), and the Department of Social Medicine (C.D.J.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Vulnerable Populations,...

Abstract

Background— Self-care training can reduce hospitalization for heart failure (HF), and more intensive intervention may benefit more vulnerable patients, including those with low literacy. Methods and Results— A 1-year, multisite, randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness trial with 605 patients with HF was conducted. Those randomized to a single session received a 40-minute in-person, literacy-sensitive training; the multisession group received the same initial training and then ongoing telephone-based support. The primary outcome was combined incidence of all-cause hospitalization or death; secondary outcomes included HF-related hospitalization and HF-related quality of life, with prespecified stratification by literacy. Overall, the incidence of all-cause hospitalization and death did not differ between intervention groups (incidence rate ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.22). The effect of multisession training compared with single-session training differed by literacy group: Among those with low literacy, the multisession training yielded a lower incidence of all-cause hospitalization and death (incidence rate ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.45–1.25), and among those with higher literacy, the multisession intervention yielded a higher incidence (incidence rate ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–1.50; interaction P =0.048). For HF-related hospitalization, among those with low literacy, multisession training yielded a lower incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–1.12), and among those with higher literacy, it yielded a higher incidence (incidence rate ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.88; interaction P =0.005). HF-related quality of life improved more for patients receiving multisession than for those receiving single-session interventions at 1 and 6 months, but the difference at 12 months was smaller. Effects on HF-related quality of life did not differ by literacy. Conclusions— Overall, an intensive multisession intervention did not change clinical outcomes compared with a single-session intervention. People with low literacy appear to benefit more from multisession interventions than people with higher literacy. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00378950.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials;McAlister FA;J Am Coll Cardiol,2004

2. Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure;Inglis SC;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2010

3. A heart failure self-management program for patients of all literacy levels: A randomized, controlled trial [ISRCTN11535170]

4. Randomised trial of telephone intervention in chronic heart failure: DIAL trial

5. Heart failure disease management programs: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Cited by 98 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3