Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition Compared With Enalapril on the Risk of Clinical Progression in Surviving Patients With Heart Failure
-
Published:2015-01-06
Issue:1
Volume:131
Page:54-61
-
ISSN:0009-7322
-
Container-title:Circulation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Circulation
Author:
Packer Milton1, McMurray John J.V.1, Desai Akshay S.1, Gong Jianjian1, Lefkowitz Martin P.1, Rizkala Adel R.1, Rouleau Jean L.1, Shi Victor C.1, Solomon Scott D.1, Swedberg Karl1, Zile Michael1, Andersen Karl1, Arango Juan Luis1, Arnold J. Malcolm1, Bělohlávek Jan1, Böhm Michael1, Boytsov Sergey1, Burgess Lesley J.1, Cabrera Walter1, Calvo Carlos1, Chen Chen-Huan1, Dukat Andrej1, Duarte Yan Carlos1, Erglis Andrejs1, Fu Michael1, Gomez Efrain1, Gonzàlez-Medina Angel1, Hagège Albert A.1, Huang Jun1, Katova Tzvetana1, Kiatchoosakun Songsak1, Kim Kee-Sik1, Kozan Ömer1, Llamas Edmundo Bayram1, Martinez Felipe1, Merkely Bela1, Mendoza Iván1, Mosterd Arend1, Negrusz-Kawecka Marta1, Peuhkurinen Keijo1, Ramires Felix J.A.1, Refsgaard Jens1, Rosenthal Arvo1, Senni Michele1, Sibulo Antonio S.1, Silva-Cardoso José1, Squire Iain B.1, Starling Randall C.1, Teerlink John R.1, Vanhaecke Johan1, Vinereanu Dragos1, Wong Raymond Ching-Chiew1
Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (M.P.); BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK (J.J.V.M.); Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Cardiovascular Medicine, MA (A.S.D., S.D.S.); Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ (J.G., M.P.L., A.R.R., V.C.S.); Université de Montréal, Institut de Cardiologie, Montréal, Canada (J.L.R.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Gothenburg,...
Abstract
Background—
Clinical trials in heart failure have focused on the improvement in symptoms or decreases in the risk of death and other cardiovascular events. Little is known about the effect of drugs on the risk of clinical deterioration in surviving patients.
Methods and Results—
We compared the angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 (400 mg daily) with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril (20 mg daily) in 8399 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in a double-blind trial. The analyses focused on prespecified measures of nonfatal clinical deterioration. In comparison with the enalapril group, fewer LCZ696-treated patients required intensification of medical treatment for heart failure (520 versus 604; hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.94;
P
=0.003) or an emergency department visit for worsening heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52–0.85;
P
=0.001). The patients in the LCZ696 group had 23% fewer hospitalizations for worsening heart failure (851 versus 1079;
P
<0.001) and were less likely to require intensive care (768 versus 879; 18% rate reduction,
P
=0.005), to receive intravenous positive inotropic agents (31% risk reduction,
P
<0.001), and to have implantation of a heart failure device or cardiac transplantation (22% risk reduction,
P
=0.07). The reduction in heart failure hospitalization with LCZ696 was evident within the first 30 days after randomization. Worsening of symptom scores in surviving patients was consistently more common in the enalapril group. LCZ696 led to an early and sustained reduction in biomarkers of myocardial wall stress and injury (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin) versus enalapril.
Conclusions—
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition prevents the clinical progression of surviving patients with heart failure more effectively than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.
Clinical Trial Registration—
URL:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique identifier: NCT01035255.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
566 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|