Studies of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis of the Arterial and Venous Blood in Normal Subjects and Patients with Atherosclerosis

Author:

NAIMI SHAPUR1,GOLDSTEIN ROBERT1,PROGER SAMUEL1

Affiliation:

1. From the Pratt Clinic-New England Center Hospital and the Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

In studies of coagulation of the arterial and venous blood of relatively young normal subjects, there were statistically significant arteriovenous differences in some of the tests employed. These differences, however, were not all in the same direction, in that some indicated increased and some decreased coagulation activity of the arterial blood. In patients with coronary heart disease, these arteriovenous differences were absent or less marked. It was suggested that this change in arteriovenous difference in such patients could possibly be attributed to the surface effect of the diseased arterial wall on the coagulation mechanism. It was recognized, however, that a number of other factors could contribute to, or entirely account for, this phenomenon. There was some evidence of increased coagulation activity in the venous blood of patients with coronary heart disease as compared to matched controls. This was indicated by a more rapid generation of thromboplastin with the addition of inosithin (platelet substitute), and a more rapid generation as well as a greater yield of thromboplastin without the addition of inosithin. Fibrinolytic activity was significantly lower in the arterial blood compared to the venous in both the normal subjects and patients with atherosclerosis. This arteriovenous difference was greater in the atherosclerotic group and it was widely variable. Because of this variability, venous fibrinolysis determinations could not be taken as an indicator of the level of fibrinolytic activity in the arterial blood. Hence, it was suggested that in studies of fibrinolysis as related to atherosclerosis, arterial blood samples should be routinely used. Fibrinolytic activity of the blood in the atherosclerotic group as a whole was lower than that in the normal group on both the arterial and the venous sides. The difference between the two groups was greater in the arterial than the venous blood. In the group with atherosclerosis, the subgroup with coronary heart disease and that with occlusive disease of the peripheral arteries were separately analyzed. The subgroup with coronary heart disease exhibited a significantly lower fibrinolytic activity compared to normal subjects only in the arterial blood, whereas the subgroup with occlusive disease of the peripheral arteries showed a lower fibrinolytic activity in both the arterial and the venous blood. In the subgroup with occlusive disease of the peripheral arteries, it was particularly note-worthy that the younger patients had a very low fibrinolytic activity. It was thought that one could only speculate as to whether this low fibrinolytic activity in such young patients is in any way causally related to the disease process. It appeared that in patients with coronary heart disease the delicate balance of coagulation and fibrinolysis was tipped in the direction of clot formation. It was not clear, however, whether the changes in blood coagulation and fibrinolysis observed in such patients were etiologic in the pathogenesis of the disease process, associated with it, or simply a secondary phenomenon. Moreover, it was recognized that in vitro demonstration of such changes in blood coagulation and fibrinolysis does not necessarily imply in vivo hypercoagulability. No correlation was found between the level of serum cholesterol and plasma fibrinolytic activity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 63 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3