Efficacy of Servo-Controlled Splanchnic Venous Compression in the Treatment of Orthostatic Hypotension

Author:

Okamoto Luis E.1,Diedrich André1,Baudenbacher Franz J.1,Harder René1,Whitfield Jonathan S.1,Iqbal Fahad1,Gamboa Alfredo1,Shibao Cyndya A.1,Black Bonnie K.1,Raj Satish R.1,Robertson David1,Biaggioni Italo1

Affiliation:

1. From the Vanderbilt Autonomic Dysfunction Center (L.E.O., A.D., A.G., C.A.S., B.K.B., S.R.R., D.R., I.B.), Division of Clinical Pharmacology (L.E.O., A.D., A.G., C.A.S., B.K.B., S.R.R., D.R., I.B.), Departments of Medicine (L.E.O., A.D., J.S.W., A.G., C.A.S., B.K.B., S.R.R., D.R., I.B.), Pharmacology (S.R.R., D.R., I.B.), Neurology (D.R.), Biomedical Engineering (A.D., F.J.B., F.I.), and Electrical Engineering (R.H.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

Abstract

Splanchnic venous pooling is a major hemodynamic determinant of orthostatic hypotension, but is not specifically targeted by pressor agents, the mainstay of treatment. We developed an automated inflatable abdominal binder that provides sustained servo-controlled venous compression (40 mm Hg) and can be activated only on standing. We tested the efficacy of this device against placebo and compared it to midodrine in 19 autonomic failure patients randomized to receive either placebo, midodrine (2.5–10 mg), or placebo combined with binder on separate days in a single-blind, crossover study. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured seated and standing before and 1-hour post medication; the binder was inflated immediately before standing. Only midodrine increased seated SBP (31±5 versus 9±4 placebo and 7±5 binder, P =0.003), whereas orthostatic tolerance (defined as area under the curve of upright SBP [AUC SBP ]) improved similarly with binder and midodrine (AUC SBP , 195±35 and 197±41 versus 19±38 mm Hg×minute for placebo; P =0.003). Orthostatic symptom burden decreased with the binder (from 21.9±3.6 to 16.3±3.1, P =0.032) and midodrine (from 25.6±3.4 to 14.2±3.3, P <0.001), but not with placebo (from 19.6±3.5 to 20.1±3.3, P =0.756). We also compared the combination of midodrine and binder with midodrine alone. The combination produced a greater increase in orthostatic tolerance (AUC SBP , 326±65 versus 140±53 mm Hg×minute for midodrine alone; P =0.028, n=21) and decreased orthostatic symptoms (from 21.8±3.2 to 12.9±2.9, P <0.001). In conclusion, servo-controlled abdominal venous compression with an automated inflatable binder is as effective as midodrine, the standard of care, in the management of orthostatic hypotension. Combining both therapies produces greater improvement in orthostatic tolerance. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00223691.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 58 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3