Applicability of Blood Pressure–Lowering Drug Trials to Real-World Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Author:

Bonekamp Nadia E.1,Spiering Wilko1ORCID,Nathoe Hendrik M.2,Kappelle L. Jaap3,de Borst Gert J.4ORCID,Visseren Frank L.J.1,Westerink Jan1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Vascular Medicine (N.E.B., W.S., F.L.J.V., J.W.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

2. Department of Cardiology (H.M.N.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

3. Department of Neurology (L.J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

4. Department of Vascular Surgery (G.J.d.B.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess applicability of blood pressure–lowering drug trials to real-world secondary preventive care. We applied the eligibility criteria of the landmark blood pressure–lowering drug trials (EUROPA, PEACE, HOPE-peripheral arterial disease [PAD], PRoFESS, and PROGRESS) to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD; n=5155), peripheral arterial disease (PAD; n=1487), and cerebrovascular disease (n=2515) participating in the UCC-SMART cohort. Baseline differences according to trial eligibility were assessed. Differences in risk of all-cause mortality and a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (major adverse cardiovascular event) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. Seventy-five percent of UCC-SMART patients with CAD would have been eligible for EUROPA, 84% for PEACE, 59% of patients with PAD for HOPE-PAD, 17% of patients with cerebrovascular disease for PRoFESS, and 100% for PROGRESS. Eligible patients were older (average difference ranging 1.4–14.6 years across trials). Eligible patients with CAD were at lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular event after adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors in PEACE (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.53–0.79]) and of mortality in both EUROPA (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62–0.82]) and PEACE (0.63 [95% CI, 0.51–0.78]). Adjusted mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event risks were not different between eligible and ineligible patients with PAD and cerebrovascular disease in HOPE-PAD, PRoFESS, and PROGRESS. The majority of real-world patients with CAD, PAD, or cerebrovascular disease would be eligible for landmark trials on blood pressure–lowering drugs. Patients with CAD ineligible for the EUROPA and PEACE trials are at higher adjusted mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event risks, which may limit applicability of their results to ineligible patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3