Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Antagonism and ACE Inhibition Produce Similar Renoprotection in N ω -Nitro- l >-Arginine Methyl Ester/Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

Abstract

Abstract —This study was conducted to determine potentially differential effects between an angiotensin II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor antagonist and an ACE inhibitor on systemic, renal, and glomerular hemodynamics and pathological changes in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with N ω -nitro- l >-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)–exacerbated nephrosclerosis. The hemodynamic, renal micropuncture, and pathological studies were performed in 9 groups of 17-week-old male SHR treated as follows: group 1, controls (n=16); group 2, candesartan (10 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=7); group 3, enalapril (30 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=8); group 4, candesartan (5 mg/kg per day) plus enalapril (15 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=9); group 5, L-NAME (50 mg/L in drinking water for 3 weeks) (n=17); group 6, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus candesartan (10 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=7); group 7, L-NAME (50 mg/L) for 3 weeks followed by candesartan (10 mg/kg per day) for another 3 weeks (n=8); group 8, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus enalapril (30 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=7); and group 9, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus enalapril (30 mg/kg per day) and the bradykinin antagonist icatibant (500 μg/kg SC per day via osmotic minipump for 3 weeks) (n=7). Both candesartan and enalapril similarly reduced mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance index. These changes were associated with significant decreases in afferent and efferent glomerular arteriolar resistances as well as glomerular capillary pressure. Histopathologically, the glomerular and arterial injury scores were decreased significantly, and left ventricular and aortic masses also were diminished significantly in all treated groups. L-NAME–induced urinary protein excretion was prevented by both candesartan and enalapril. Thus, both AT 1 receptor and ACE inhibition prevented and reversed the pathophysiological alterations of L-NAME–exacerbated nephrosclerosis in SHR. Itatibant only blunted the antihypertensive effects of enalapril but did not attenuate the beneficial effects of ACE inhibition on the L-NAME–induced nephrosclerosis. Thus, the AT 1 receptor antagonism and ACE inhibition have similar renal preventive effects, which most likely were achieved through reduction in the effects of angiotensin II, and ACE inhibition of bradykinin degradation demonstrated little evidence of renoprotection.