Biomarker Profiles in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Author:

Tromp Jasper1,Khan Mohsin A. F.12,Klip IJsbrand T.1,Meyer Sven13,de Boer Rudolf A.1,Jaarsma Tiny4,Hillege Hans1,van Veldhuisen Dirk J.1,van der Meer Peter1,Voors Adriaan A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen, The Netherlands

2. Heart Failure Research Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Oldenburg, European Medical School Oldenburg‐Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

4. Department of Social‐ and Welfare Studies, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Abstract

Background Biomarkers may help us to unravel differences in the underlying pathophysiology between heart failure ( HF ) patients with a reduced ejection fraction ( HF r EF ) and a preserved ejection fraction ( HF p EF ). Therefore, we compared biomarker profiles to characterize pathophysiological differences between patients with HF r EF and HF p EF . Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed 33 biomarkers from different pathophysiological domains (inflammation, oxidative stress, remodeling, cardiac stretch, angiogenesis, arteriosclerosis, and renal function) in 460 HF patients (21% HF p EF , left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%) measured at discharge after hospitalization for acute HF . The association between these markers and the occurrence of all‐cause mortality and/or HF ‐related rehospitalizations at 18 months was compared between patients with HF r EF and HF p EF . Patients were 70.6±11.4 years old and 37.4% were female. Patients with HF p EF were older, more often female, and had a higher systolic blood pressure. Levels of high‐sensitive C‐reactive protein were significantly higher in HF p EF , while levels of pro‐atrial‐type natriuretic peptide and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide were higher in HF r EF . Linear regression followed by network analyses revealed prominent inflammation and angiogenesis‐associated interactions in HF p EF and mainly cardiac stretch–associated interactions in HF r EF . The angiogenesis‐specific marker, neuropilin and the remodeling‐specific marker, osteopontin were predictive for all‐cause mortality and/or HF ‐related rehospitalizations at 18 months in HF p EF , but not in HF r EF ( P for interaction <0.05). Conclusions In HF p EF , inflammation and angiogenesis‐mediated interactions are predominantly observed, while stretch‐mediated interactions are found in HF r EF . The remodeling marker osteopontin and the angiogenesis marker neuropilin predicted outcome in HF p EF , but not in HF r EF .

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 191 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3