Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort

Author:

Varma Niraj1,Mittal Suneet2,Prillinger Julie B.3,Snell Jeff4,Dalal Nirav3,Piccini Jonathan P.5

Affiliation:

1. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

2. Valley Health System, Ridgewood, NJ

3. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Sylmar, CA

4. Data Informs, LLC, Chatsworth, CA

5. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Abstract

Background Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers ( PM ), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) devices is unclear. Methods and Results Consecutive US patients with newly implanted PM , implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and CRT devices from a large remote monitoring database between 2008 and 2011 were included in this observational cohort study. Sex‐specific all‐cause survival postimplant was compared within each device type using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, stratified on age and adjusted for remote monitoring utilization and ZIP ‐based socioeconomic variables. A total of 269 471 patients were assessed over a median 2.9 [interquartile range, 2.2, 3.6] years. Unadjusted mortality rates ( MR ; deaths/100 000 patient‐years) were similar between women versus men receiving PM s (n=115 076, 55% male; MR 4193 versus MR 4256, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI , 0.84–0.90; P <0.001) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=85 014, 74% male; MR 4417 versus MR 4479, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI , 0.93–1.02; P =0.244). In contrast, survival was superior in women receiving CRT defibrillators (n=61 475, 72% male; MR 5270 versus male MR 7175; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI , 0.70–0.76; P <0.001) and also CRT pacemakers (n=7906, 57% male; MR 5383 versus male MR 7625, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI , 0.61–0.78; P <0.001). This relative difference increased with time. These results were unaffected by age or remote monitoring utilization. Conclusions Women accounted for less than 30% of high‐voltage implants and fewer than half of low‐voltage implants in a large, nation‐wide cohort. Survival for women and men receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators and PM s was similar, but dramatically greater for women receiving both defibrillator‐ and PM‐based CRT .

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3