Affiliation:
1. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
2. Valley Health System, Ridgewood, NJ
3. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Sylmar, CA
4. Data Informs, LLC, Chatsworth, CA
5. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Abstract
Background
Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers (
PM
), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (
CRT
) devices is unclear.
Methods and Results
Consecutive US patients with newly implanted
PM
, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and
CRT
devices from a large remote monitoring database between 2008 and 2011 were included in this observational cohort study. Sex‐specific all‐cause survival postimplant was compared within each device type using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, stratified on age and adjusted for remote monitoring utilization and
ZIP
‐based socioeconomic variables. A total of 269 471 patients were assessed over a median 2.9 [interquartile range, 2.2, 3.6] years. Unadjusted mortality rates (
MR
; deaths/100 000 patient‐years) were similar between women versus men receiving
PM
s (n=115 076, 55% male;
MR
4193 versus
MR
4256, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95%
CI
, 0.84–0.90;
P
<0.001) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=85 014, 74% male;
MR
4417 versus
MR
4479, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95%
CI
, 0.93–1.02;
P
=0.244). In contrast, survival was superior in women receiving
CRT
defibrillators (n=61 475, 72% male;
MR
5270 versus male MR 7175; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95%
CI
, 0.70–0.76;
P
<0.001) and also
CRT
pacemakers (n=7906, 57% male;
MR
5383 versus male MR 7625, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95%
CI
, 0.61–0.78;
P
<0.001). This relative difference increased with time. These results were unaffected by age or remote monitoring utilization.
Conclusions
Women accounted for less than 30% of high‐voltage implants and fewer than half of low‐voltage implants in a large, nation‐wide cohort. Survival for women and men receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators and
PM
s was similar, but dramatically greater for women receiving both defibrillator‐ and PM‐based
CRT
.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献