Clinical and Epidemiological Implications of 24‐Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Hypertension in Kenyan Adults: A Population‐Based Study

Author:

Etyang Anthony O.12,Warne Ben1,Kapesa Sailoki1,Munge Kenneth1,Bauni Evasius1,Cruickshank J. Kennedy3,Smeeth Liam2,Scott J. Anthony G.12

Affiliation:

1. KEMRI‐Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya

2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

3. King's College, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background The clinical and epidemiological implications of using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ( ABPM ) for the diagnosis of hypertension have not been studied at a population level in sub‐Saharan Africa. We examined the impact of ABPM use among Kenyan adults. Methods and Results We performed a nested case–control study of diagnostic accuracy. We selected an age‐stratified random sample of 1248 adults from the list of residents of the Kilifi Health and Demographic Surveillance System in Kenya. All participants underwent a screening blood pressure (BP) measurement. All those with screening BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and a random subset of those with screening BP <140/90 mm Hg were invited to undergo ABPM . Based on the 2 tests, participants were categorized as sustained hypertensive, masked hypertensive, “white coat” hypertensive, or normotensive. Analyses were weighted by the probability of undergoing ABPM . Screening BP ≥140/90 mm Hg was present in 359 of 986 participants, translating to a crude population prevalence of 23.1% (95% CI 16.5–31.5%). Age standardized prevalence of screening BP ≥140/90 mm Hg was 26.5% (95% CI 19.3–35.6%). On ABPM , 186 of 415 participants were confirmed to be hypertensive, with crude prevalence of 15.6% (95% CI 9.4–23.1%) and age‐standardized prevalence of 17.1% (95% CI 11.0–24.4%). Age‐standardized prevalence of masked and white coat hypertension were 7.6% (95% CI 2.8–13.7%) and 3.8% (95% CI 1.7–6.1%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of screening BP measurements were 80% (95% CI 73–86%) and 84% (95% CI 79–88%), respectively. BP indices and validity measures showed strong age‐related trends. Conclusions Screening BP measurement significantly overestimated hypertension prevalence while failing to identify ≈50% of true hypertension diagnosed by ABPM . Our findings suggest significant clinical and epidemiological benefits of ABPM use for diagnosing hypertension in Kenyan adults.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3