Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus‐Eluting Stent Versus Durable‐Polymer Everolimus‐Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2‐Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial

Author:

Zbinden Rainer1,Piccolo Raffaele2,Heg Dik3,Roffi Marco4,Kurz David J.1,Muller Olivier5,Vuilliomenet André6,Cook Stéphane7,Weilenmann Daniel8,Kaiser Christoph9,Jamshidi Peiman10,Franzone Anna2,Eberli Franz1,Jüni Peter11,Windecker Stephan2,Pilgrim Thomas2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Triemlispital, Zurich, Switzerland

2. Department of Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

3. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine and Clinical Trials Unit, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

4. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

5. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

6. Department of Cardiology, Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland

7. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Fribourg

8. Department of Cardiology, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland

9. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

10. Department of Cardiology, Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland

11. Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Background No data are available on the long‐term performance of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stents ( BPSES ). We reported 2‐year clinical outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE (Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus‐Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus‐Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularisation) trial, which compared BPSES with durable‐polymer everolimus‐eluting stents ( DPEES ) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results A total of 2119 patients with minimal exclusion criteria were assigned to treatment with BPSES (n=1063) or DPEES (n=1056). Follow‐up at 2 years was available for 2048 patients (97%). The primary end point was target‐lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target‐vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target‐lesion revascularization. At 2 years, target‐lesion failure occurred in 107 patients (10.5%) in the BPSES arm and 107 patients (10.4%) in the DPEES arm (risk ratio [ RR ] 1.00, 95% CI 0.77–1.31, P =0.979). There were no significant differences between BPSES and DPEES with respect to cardiac death ( RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.62–1.63, P =0.984), target‐vessel myocardial infarction ( RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.60–1.39, P =0.669), target‐lesion revascularization ( RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.81–1.71, P =0.403), and definite stent thrombosis ( RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.56–3.44, P =0.485). There were 2 cases (0.2%) of definite very late stent thrombosis in the BPSES arm and 4 cases (0.4%) in the DPEES arm ( P =0.423). In the prespecified subgroup of patients with ST ‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, BPSES was associated with a lower risk of target‐lesion failure compared with DPEES ( RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23–0.99, P =0.043, P interaction =0.026). Conclusions Comparable safety and efficacy profiles of BPSES and DPEES were maintained throughout 2 years of follow‐up. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01443104.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3