Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Author:

Yiadom Maame Yaa A. B.1,Baugh Christopher W.2,McWade Conor M.1,Liu Xulei1,Song Kyoung Jun3,Patterson Brian W.4,Jenkins Cathy A.1,Tanski Mary5,Mills Angela M.6,Salazar Gilberto7,Wang Thomas J.1,Dittus Robert S.1,Liu Dandan1,Storrow Alan B.1

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI

5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR

6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

7. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX

Abstract

Background Timely diagnosis of ST ‐segment elevation myocardial infarction ( STEMI ) in the emergency department ( ED ) is made solely by ECG . Obtaining this test within 10 minutes of ED arrival is critical to achieving the best outcomes. We investigated variability in the timely identification of STEMI across institutions and whether performance variation was associated with the ED characteristics, the comprehensiveness of screening criteria, and the STEMI screening processes. Methods and Results We examined STEMI screening performance in 7 ED s, with the missed case rate ( MCR ) as our primary end point. The MCR is the proportion of primarily screened ED patients diagnosed with STEMI who did not receive an ECG within 15 minutes of ED arrival. STEMI was defined by hospital discharge diagnosis. Relationships between the MCR and ED characteristics, screening criteria, and STEMI screening processes were assessed, along with differences in door‐to‐ ECG times for captured versus missed patients. The overall MCR for all 7 ED s was 12.8%. The lowest and highest MCR s were 3.4% and 32.6%, respectively. The mean difference in door‐to‐ ECG times for captured and missed patients was 31 minutes, with a range of 14 to 80 minutes of additional myocardial ischemia time for missed cases. The prevalence of primarily screened ED STEMI s was 0.09%. ED s with the greatest informedness (sensitivity+specificity−1) demonstrated superior performance across all other screening measures. Conclusions The 29.2% difference in MCRs between the highest and lowest performing ED s demonstrates room for improving timely STEMI identification among primarily screened ED patients. The MCR and informedness can be used to compare screening across ED s and to understand variable performance.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3