Predictors of Death and Stroke After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting

Author:

Theiss Wolfram1,Hermanek Peter1,Mathias Klaus1,Brückmann Hartmut1,Dembski Jürgen1,Hoffmann Franz-Josef1,Kerner Rüdiger1,Leisch Franz1,Mudra Harald1,Schulte Karl-Ludwig1,Sievert Horst1

Affiliation:

1. From the Medizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität (W.T.), Munich, Germany; Bayerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Stationären Versorgung (P.H.), Munich, Germany; the Institut für Strahlendiagnostik der Städtischen Kliniken (K.M.), Dortmund, Germany; Abteilung für Neuroradiologie (H.B.), Klinikum Grosshadern der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Abteilung für Radiologie des Krankenhaus Marienhof (J.D.), Koblenz, Germany; Abteilung für...

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Little is known about the significance of patient characteristics, clinical indications, and technical details on the risk of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). The purpose of this study was to test these parameters as to their predictive value for the peri-interventional risk of CAS. Methods— Pro-CAS is a prospective, multicenter registry of CAS. Logistic regression analysis of possible predictive factors was performed on 5341 interventions that had been entered by 25 clinical centers between July 1999 and June 2005. Results— The combined in-hospital mortality and stroke rate was 3.6%. The following were found to be significant predictors of peri-interventional stroke and death: center experience (≤50 versus 51 to 150 versus ≥151 interventions), age, prior symptoms, primary intervention as compared with intervention for restenosis, angioplasty without stent, predilatation, and heparin dosage >5000 IU. No statistically significant result was found for year of intervention, patient volume, gender, interval between symptoms and CAS, ocular versus neurological symptoms, side of CAS, degree of stenosis of the target lesion, presence of contralateral high-degree stenosis or occlusion, method of gaining access to the carotids, stent type, and use of a protection system. Conclusions— Our findings underline the need for dedicated training and strict credentialing rules for CAS. In addition, they might help to identify subgroups of patients at differential risk for CAS and carotid endarterectomy and yield a basis for correcting risks due to differences in case mix in reports about CAS.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3