Reperfusion Rather than Ischemia Drives the Formation of Ubiquitin Aggregates After Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Author:

Hochrainer Karin1,Jackman Katherine1,Anrather Josef1,Iadecola Costantino1

Affiliation:

1. From the Division of Neurobiology, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Cerebral ischemia leads to accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates. However, the factors triggering ubiquitination and their impact on the outcome of cerebral ischemia remain poorly understood. Here we investigate the relationship between ubiquitin aggregation and duration of ischemia/reperfusion, infarct volume, and proteasomal activity in a mouse model of focal ischemia. Methods— Free ubiquitin and ubiquitin aggregate levels were examined by Western blotting in the mouse neocortex and striatum after different periods of ischemia/reperfusion and permanent ischemia induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion. Infarct volumes were measured in thionin-stained brain sections. Proteasome activity was studied by fluorometric peptidase activity assay. Results— Following transient ischemia, ubiquitin aggregates were detected in the ipsilateral neocortex and, to a lesser extent, striatum only after induction of reperfusion. In permanent ischemia, no ubiquitin aggregates were found. Shorter ischemic periods producing no or minimal tissue damage (10–15 minutes) resulted in ubiquitin aggregate levels similar to those produced by ischemia resulting in substantial infarction (30 minutes). Proteasomal impairment was greatest in ischemia without reperfusion, in which no ubiquitin aggregates were detected. Conclusions— The data demonstrate that reperfusion rather than ischemia leads to the appearance of ubiquitinated aggregates, which form in the absence of major tissue damage and are not correlated with decreased proteasomal peptidase activity. Ubiquitin aggregates may form in potentially viable brain tissue, which may be later recruited into infarction by factors independent of ubiquitination.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3