Effect of Peer Education on Stroke Prevention

Author:

Kronish Ian M.1,Goldfinger Judith Z.1,Negron Rennie1,Fei Kezhen1,Tuhrim Stanley1,Arniella Guedy1,Horowitz Carol R.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (I.M.K.); Departments of Medicine (J.Z.G., C.R.H.), Health Evidence and Policy (R.N., K.F., C.R.H.), and Neurology (S.T.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; and Department of Family Medicine, Institute for Family Health, New York, NY (G.A.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Efforts to reduce disparities in recurrent stroke among Black and Latino stroke survivors have met with limited success. We aimed to determine the effect of peer education on secondary stroke prevention among predominantly minority stroke survivors. Methods— Between 2009 and 2012, we enrolled 600 stroke or transient ischemic attack survivors from diverse, low-income communities in New York City into a 2-arm randomized clinical trial that compared a 6 week (1 session/week), peer-led, community-based, stroke prevention self-management group workshop (N=301) to a wait-list control group (N=299). The primary outcome was the proportion with a composite of controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and use of antithrombotic medications at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included control of the individual stroke risk factors. All analyses were by intent-to-treat. Results— There was no difference in the proportion of intervention and control group participants achieving the composite outcome (34% versus 34%; P =0.98). The proportion with controlled blood pressure at 6 months was greater in the intervention group than in the control group (76% versus 67%; P =0.02). This corresponded to a greater change in systolic blood pressure in the intervention versus control group (−3.63 SD, 19.81 mm Hg versus +0.34 SD, 23.76 mm Hg; P =0.04). There were no group differences in the control of cholesterol or use of antithrombotics. Conclusions— A low-cost peer education self-management workshop modestly improved blood pressure, but not low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or antithrombotic use, among stroke and transient ischemic attack survivors from vulnerable, predominantly minority urban communities. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT0102727 . Unique identifier: NCT01027273.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3