Stroke Learning Health Systems: A Topical Narrative Review With Case Examples

Author:

Cadilhac Dominique A.12ORCID,Bravata Dawn M.345ORCID,Bettger Janet Prvu6ORCID,Mikulik Robert78ORCID,Norrving Bo9ORCID,Uvere Ezinne O.10ORCID,Owolabi Mayowa10ORCID,Ranta Annemarei11ORCID,Kilkenny Monique F.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia (D.A.C., M.F.K.).

2. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia (D.A.C., M.F.K.).

3. Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN (D.M.B.).

4. Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (D.M.B.).

5. Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN (D.M.B.).

6. Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA (J.P.B.).

7. International Clinical Research Centre, Neurology Department, St. Ann’s University Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (R.M.).

8. Health Management Institute, Czech Republic (R.M.).

9. Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden (B.N.).

10. Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria (E.O.U., M.O.).

11. Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand (A.R.).

Abstract

To our knowledge, the adoption of Learning Health System (LHS) concepts or approaches for improving stroke care, patient outcomes, and value have not previously been summarized. This topical review provides a summary of the published evidence about LHSs applied to stroke, and case examples applied to different aspects of stroke care from high and low-to-middle income countries. Our attempt to systematically identify the relevant literature and obtain real-world examples demonstrated the dissemination gaps, the lack of learning and action for many of the related LHS concepts across the continuum of care but also elucidated the opportunity for continued dialogue on how to study and scale LHS advances. In the field of stroke, we found only a few published examples of LHSs and health systems globally implementing some selected LHS concepts, but the term is not common. A major barrier to identifying relevant LHS examples in stroke may be the lack of an agreed taxonomy or terminology for classification. We acknowledge that health service delivery settings that leverage many of the LHS concepts do so operationally and the lessons learned are not shared in peer-reviewed literature. It is likely that this topical review will further stimulate the stroke community to disseminate related activities and use keywords such as learning health system so that the evidence base can be more readily identified.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3