Long-Term Outcome After Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Stenosis Compared With Medical Treatment in the C arotid A nd V ertebral A rtery T ransluminal A ngioplasty S tudy (CAVATAS)

Author:

Coward Lucy J.1,McCabe Dominick J.H.1,Ederle Joerg1,Featherstone Roland L.1,Clifton Andrew1,Brown Martin M.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Stroke Research Group (L.C.J., J.E., R.L.F., M.M.B.), UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London; the Department of Neurology, the Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin (D.J.H.M.); the National Children’s Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland (D.J.H.M.); and the Department of Neuroradiology (A.C.), St. George’s Hospital, London, England.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The long-term outcome of endovascular intervention compared with best medical management of patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis is uncertain. We therefore compared these treatments in a randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Methods— In the international, multicenter C arotid A nd V ertebral A rtery T ransluminal A ngioplasty S tudy, 16 patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis were randomized in equal proportions to receive endovascular therapy (balloon angioplasty or stenting) or best medical treatment alone. An independent neurologist followed up the patients for as long as 8 years. Results— Endovascular intervention was technically successful in all 8 patients, but 2 patients experienced transient ischemic attack at the time of endovascular treatment. There were no deaths or strokes in any arterial territory within the first 30 days. During a mean follow-up period of 4.7 years, no patient in either treatment group experienced a vertebrobasilar territory stroke, but 3 patients in each treatment arm died of myocardial infarction or carotid territory stroke, and 1 endovascular patient had a nonfatal carotid territory stroke. Conclusions— Patients with vertebral artery stenosis were more likely to have carotid territory stroke and myocardial infarction during follow-up than have recurrent vertebrobasilar stroke. The trial failed to show a benefit of endovascular treatment of vertebral artery stenosis, but the numbers of patients included was small. Larger randomized trials are required to determine whether vertebral artery stenting is justified in patients at higher risk of vertebrobasilar stroke. Treatment of patients with vertebral artery stenosis should focus on global reduction of vascular risk, including prevention of carotid territory stroke and myocardial infarction.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Reference30 articles.

1. Proximal Extracranial Vertebral Artery Disease in the New England Medical Center Posterior Circulation Registry

2. Berguer R. Vertebrobasilar ischaemia: indications techniques and results of surgical repair. In: Rutherford RB ed. Vascular Surgery 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 2000: 1823–1837.

3. Intracranial Vertebral Endarterectomy

4. Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Stenosis Undergoing Surgical Procedures

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3