Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin Labeling Quantifies Relative Cerebral Blood Flow in Acute Stroke

Author:

Hernandez Daymara A.1,Bokkers Reinoud P.H.1,Mirasol Raymond V.1,Luby Marie1,Henning Erica C.1,Merino José G.1,Warach Steven1,Latour Lawrence L.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Section on Stroke Diagnostics and Therapeutics (D.A.H., R.V.M., M.L., E.C.H., J.G.M., S.W., L.L.L.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Radiology (R.P.H.B.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (J.G.M.), Bethesda, MD; and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (R.V.M.), National Institutes of Health Research Scholars Program, Bethesda, MD.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The aim of this study was to test whether arterial spin labeling (ASL) can detect significant differences in relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the core, mismatch, and reverse-mismatch regions, and whether rCBF values measured by ASL in those areas differ from values obtained using dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI. Methods— Acute stroke patients were imaged with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion-weighted imaging (ASL and DSC) MRI. An expert reader segmented the ischemic lesion on DWI and the DSC time-to-peak (TTP) maps. Three regions were defined: core (DWI+, TTP+), mismatch (DWI−, TTP+), and reverse-mismatch (DWI+, TTP−). For both ASL and DSC, rCBF maps were created with commercially available software, and the ratio was calculated as the mean signal intensity measured on the side of the lesion to that of the homologous region in the contralateral hemisphere. Values obtained from core, mismatch, and reverse-mismatch were used for paired comparison. Results— Twenty-eight patients were included in the study. The mean age was 65.6 (16.9) years, with a median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10 (interquartile range, 4–17). Median time from last known normal to MRI was 5.7 hours (interquartile range, 2.9–22.6). Mean rCBF ratios were significantly higher in the mismatch 0.53 (0.23) versus the core 0.39 (0.33) and reverse-mismatch 0.68 (0.49) versus the core 0.38 (0.35). Differences in rCBF measured with DSC and ASL were not significant. Conclusions— ASL allows for the measurement of rCBF in the core and mismatch regions. Values in the mismatch were significantly higher than in the core, suggesting there is potential salvageable tissue.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3