Misdiagnosis of Cervicocephalic Artery Dissection in the Emergency Department

Author:

Liberman Ava L.1ORCID,Navi Babak B.2,Esenwa Charles C.1,Zhang Cenai2,Song Justin3,Cheng Natalie T.1,Labovitz Daniel L.1,Kamel Hooman2,Merkler Alexander E.2

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (A.L.L., C.C.E., N.T.C., D.L.L.)

2. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (B.B.N., C.Z., H.K., A.E.M.).

3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (J.S.)

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Cervicocephalic artery dissection is an important cause of stroke. The clinical presentation of dissection can resemble that of benign neurological conditions leading to delayed or missed diagnosis. Methods— We performed a retrospective cohort study using statewide administrative claims data from all Emergency Department visits and admissions at nonfederal hospitals in Florida from 2005 to 2015 and New York from 2006 to 2015. Using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, CM codes , we identified adult patients hospitalized for cervicocephalic artery dissection. We defined probable misdiagnosis of dissection as having an Emergency Department treat-and-release visit for symptoms or signs of dissection, including headache, neck pain, and focal neurological deficits in the 14 days before dissection diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare adverse clinical outcomes in patients with and without probable misdiagnosis. Results— Among 7090 patients diagnosed with a dissection (mean age 52.7 years, 44.9% women), 218 (3.1% [95% CI, 2.7%–3.5%]) had a preceding probable Emergency Department misdiagnosis. After adjustment for demographics and vascular risk factors, there were no differences in rates of stroke (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.62–1.09]) or in-hospital death (odds ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.07–1.08]) between dissection patients with and without a probable misdiagnosis at index hospitalization. Conclusions— We found that ≈1 in 30 dissection patients was probably misdiagnosed in the 2 weeks before their diagnosis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3