Emergency Medicine Physicians Accurately Select Acute Stroke Patients for Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Treatment Using a Checklist

Author:

Berekashvili Ketevan1,Zha Alicia M.1,Abdel-Al Mohammed2,Zhang Xu3,Soomro Jazba H.4,Prater Samuel J.2,Grotta James C.5

Affiliation:

1. From the Institute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease (K.B., A.M.Z.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX

2. Department of Emergency Medicine (M.A., S.J.P.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX

3. Department of Internal Medicine (X.Z.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX

4. Department of Neurology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (J.H.S.)

5. Stroke Research, Memorial Hermann Hospital–Texas Medical Center, Houston (J.C.G.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— There is uncertainty among many emergency medicine physicians about the decision to give intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator), which limits its use. A checklist approach has been suggested as a solution. We compared agreement on tPA treatment in suspected acute ischemic stroke patients between emergency medicine residents (EMRs) using a checklist and vascular neurology fellows (VNFs). Methods— Every suspected acute stroke patient brought to our comprehensive stroke center emergency room within 4.5 hours from symptom onset was prospectively evaluated simultaneously and independently by VNFs and EMRs. The latter used a tPA screening checklist, which included guideline exclusion criteria to help with their treatment decision. Agreement was determined using kappa (k) statistics. Results— Over 6 months, 60 patients were enrolled; 10% large vessel atherosclerosis, 18% cardioembolism, 12% small vessel, 12% cryptogenic, and 47% mimic. Forty-two percent were deemed tPA eligible by the EMR, 30% by the VNF, and 37% by the vascular neurology faculty. There were no complications in any tPA-treated patients. Agreement was substantial between EMR and VNF (κ=0.68 [95% CI, 0.49–0.87]) and between EMR and vascular neurology faculty (κ=0.69 [95% CI, 0.50–0.87]). Stroke mimics were the main cause of disagreement between EMR and VNF (κ=0.24 [95% CI, −0.15 to 0.63]) and between EMR and vascular neurology faculty (κ=0.35 [95% CI, −0.08 to 0.78]). Conclusions— Our data suggest that with the aid of a checklist, EMRs can accurately treat stroke patients with tPA. Areas for improvement include recognition of stroke mimics. Further studies are warranted to evaluate checklist-enhanced tPA treatment to allay emergency medicine physician uncertainty and expand the use of tPA.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3