Fully Automated Segmentation Algorithm for Hematoma Volumetric Analysis in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Author:

Ironside Natasha1,Chen Ching-Jen1,Mutasa Simukayi2,Sim Justin L.3,Marfatia Saurabh2,Roh David4,Ding Dale5,Mayer Stephan A.6,Lignelli Angela2,Connolly Edward Sander3

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA (N.I., C.-J.C.)

2. Department of Radiology (S. Mutasa, S. Marfatia, A.L.)

3. Department of Neurological Surgery (J.L.S., E.S.C.)

4. Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (D.R.)

5. Department of Neurological Surgery. University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY (D.D.)

6. Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI (S.A.M.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Hematoma volume measurements influence prognosis and treatment decisions in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The aims of this study are to derive and validate a fully automated segmentation algorithm for ICH volumetric analysis using deep learning methods. Methods— In-patient computed tomography scans of 300 consecutive adults (age ≥18 years) with spontaneous, supratentorial ICH who were enrolled in the ICHOP (Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes Project; 2009–2018) were separated into training (n=260) and test (n=40) datasets. A fully automated segmentation algorithm was derived using convolutional neural networks, and it was trained on manual segmentations from the training dataset. The algorithm’s performance was assessed against manual and semiautomated segmentation methods in the test dataset. Results— The mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficients for the fully automated segmentation algorithm when tested against manual and semiautomated segmentation methods were 0.894±0.264 and 0.905±0.254, respectively. ICH volumes derived from fully automated versus manual ( R 2 =0.981; P <0.0001), fully automated versus semiautomated ( R 2 =0.978; P <0.0001), and semiautomated versus manual ( R 2 =0.990; P <0001) segmentation methods had strong between-group correlations. The fully automated segmentation algorithm (mean 12.0±2.7 s/scan) was significantly faster than both of the manual (mean 201.5±92.2 s/scan; P <0.001) and semiautomated (mean 288.58±160.3 s/scan; P <0.001) segmentation methods. Conclusions— The fully automated segmentation algorithm quantified hematoma volumes from computed tomography scans of supratentorial ICH patients with similar accuracy and substantially greater efficiency compared with manual and semiautomated segmentation methods. External validation of the fully automated segmentation algorithm is warranted.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3