General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Author:

Löwhagen Hendén Pia1,Rentzos Alexandros1,Karlsson Jan-Erik1,Rosengren Lars1,Leiram Birgitta1,Sundeman Henrik1,Dunker Dennis1,Schnabel Kunigunde1,Wikholm Gunnar1,Hellström Mikael1,Ricksten Sven-Erik1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (P.L.H., H.S., S.-E.R.), Department of Radiology (A.R., B.L., D.D., K.S., G.W., M.H.), and Department of Neurology (J.-E.K., L.R.), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Retrospective studies have found that patients receiving general anesthesia for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke have worse neurological outcome compared with patients receiving conscious sedation. In this prospective randomized single-center study, we investigated the impact of anesthesia technique on neurological outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods— Ninety patients receiving endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in 2013 to 2016 were included and randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Difference in neurological outcome at 3 months, measured as modified Rankin Scale score, was analyzed (primary outcome) and early neurological improvement of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and cerebral infarction volume. Age, sex, comorbidities, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, intraprocedural blood pressure, blood glucose, Paco 2 and Pco 2 modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score, and relevant time intervals were recorded. Results— In the general anesthesia group 19 of 45 patients (42.2%) and in the conscious sedation group 18 of 45 patients (40.0%) achieved a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 ( P =1.00) at 3 months, with no differences in intraoperative blood pressure decline from baseline ( P =0.57); blood glucose ( P =0.94); PaCO2 ( P =0.68); time intervals ( P =0.78); degree of successful recanalization, 91.1% versus 88.9% ( P =1.00); National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours 8 (3–5) versus 9 (2–15; P =0.60); infarction volume, 20 (10–100) versus 20(10–54) mL ( P =0.53); and hospital mortality (13.3% in both groups; P =1.00). Conclusions— In endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, no difference was found between general anesthesia and conscious sedation in neurological outcome 3 months after stroke. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01872884.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3