Abstract
Despite significant advances in coronary angioplasty, the problems of restenosis, chronic total occlusion, diffuse disease, and abrupt closure after the procedure remain to be solved. New devices that address these problems continue to evolve. Although a controlled clinical trial is the ultimate test of any device, rapid device design changes and resource limitations require evaluating which of the new devices justify a full clinical trial. A registry mechanism for this initial evaluation is proposed and detailed. Payment for procedures using new devices is a problem for industry, insurers, hospitals, and physicians. It is proposed that reimbursement be based on the service performed rather than the device used to perform it. Costs beyond the clinical costs should be borne by the sponsor of the device. Financial conflict of interest is a recognized problem in new device evaluation. It is not always practical to insist on exclusion from the evaluation process of individuals with a financial stake in the outcome, but disclosure of the presence of such a financial interest is recommended in the reporting of results.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference16 articles.
1. Angiographic and clinical predictors of acute closure after native vessel coronary angioplasty.
2. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute: Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Washington DC 1988
3. The Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST): Analysis of baseline patient characteristics;King SB;Circulation,1990
4. Acute coronary events associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
5. Califf RM Ohman EM Frid DJ Fortin DF Mark DB Hlatky MA Herndon JE Bengtson JR in Topol E (ed): Restenosis: The Clinical Issue in Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia WB Saunders Co 1990 pp 363-394
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献