Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
2. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
3. Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
Abstract
Background
Brain‐type natriuretic peptide (
BNP
) and the amino‐terminal fragment of its prohormone (
NT
‐pro
BNP
) are known predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease; however, the relative prognostic value of these 2 biomarkers for secondary events remains unclear.
Methods and Results
In 983 participants with stable
coronary heart disease
, we evaluated the association of
BNP
and
NT
‐pro
BNP
with time to hospitalization for heart failure, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack, cardiovascular death, and combined major adverse cardiovascular events (
MACE
). During an average follow‐up of 6.5±3.3 years, both
BNP
and
NT
‐pro
BNP
were associated with increased risk of
MACE
in a multivariable‐adjusted model (hazard ratio per standard deviation of log
BNP
: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.32 to 1.89; hazard ratio per standard deviation of log
NT
‐proBNP: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.24). When added to traditional risk factors,
NT
‐pro
BNP
predicted
MACE
better than
BNP
(C statistic: 0.76 versus 0.72,
P
<0.001). Similarly, the addition of
NT
‐pro
BNP
resulted in a greater net reclassification improvement for predicting
MACE
than the addition of
BNP
(65% for
NT
‐pro
BNP
, 56% for
BNP
).
Conclusions
Both
BNP
and
NT
‐pro
BNP
were significant predictors of
MACE
in stable
coronary heart disease
; however,
NT
‐pro
BNP
was superior to
BNP
for net risk reclassification for
MACE
.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献