Shared Medical Appointments in Heart Failure for Post Acute Care Follow‐Up: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Taveira Tracey H.123ORCID,Cohen Lisa B.12,Laforest Sherry K.4ORCID,Oliver Karen13,Parent Melanie1,Hearns Rene4ORCID,Ball Sherry L.4ORCID,Dev Sandesh5ORCID,Wu Wen‐Chih123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Providence VA Medical Center Providence RI USA

2. The University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy Kingston RI USA

3. Department of Medicine Warren Alpert School of Medicine Providence RI USA

4. VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System Cleveland OH USA

5. Southern Arizona VA Health System Tucson AZ USA

Abstract

Background Shared medical appointments (SMAs) in heart failure (HF) are medical visits where several patients with HF meet with multidisciplinary providers at the same time for efficient and comprehensive care. It is unknown whether HF‐SMAs can improve overall and cardiac health status for high‐risk patients with HF discharged from acute care. Methods and Results A 3‐site, open‐label, randomized‐controlled‐trial was conducted. Participants within 12 weeks of HF acute care (emergency‐room/hospitalization) requiring intravenous diuretic therapy were randomized to receive either HF‐SMA or usual HF clinical care (usual‐care) on a 1:1 ratio. The HF‐SMA team, which consisted of a nurse, nutritionist, psychologist, nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist, provided four 2‐hour session HF‐SMAs that met every other week for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were the overall health status measured by European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale and cardiac health status by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, 180 days postrandomization. Of the 242 patients enrolled (HF‐SMA n=117, usual‐care n=125, mean age 69.3±9.4 years, 71.5% White patients, 94.6% male), 84% of participants completed the study (n=8 HF‐SMA and n=9 usual‐care patients died). After 180 days, both HF‐SMA and usual‐care participants had significant improvements from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire that were not statistically different. Only HF‐SMA participants had significant improvements in European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale (mean change = 7.2±15.8 in HF‐SMA versus −0.4±19.0 points in usual‐care, P  < 0.001). Conclusions Both HF‐SMA and usual‐care in participants with HF achieved significant improvements in cardiac health status, but only a team approach through HF‐SMA achieved significant improvements in overall health status. Future larger studies are needed to evaluate hospitalization and death outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02481921.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3