Global Sex Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review

Author:

Chen Christina1ORCID,Lo Christopher Y. Z.2ORCID,Ho Maxz J. C.3ORCID,Ng Yaoyi4ORCID,Chan Harold C. Y.5ORCID,Wu Wellington H. K.4ORCID,Ong Marcus E. H.6ORCID,Siddiqui Fahad J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Prehospital and Emergency Research Centre, Health Services and Systems Research Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore

2. Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore

3. National University Hospital Singapore Singapore

4. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

5. Singapore General Hospital Singapore Singapore

6. Department of Emergency Medicine Singapore General Hospital Singapore Singapore

Abstract

This scoping review collates evidence for sex biases in the receipt of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) among patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest patients globally. The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Embase databases were screened for relevant literature, dated from inception to March 9, 2022. Studies evaluating the association between BCPR and sex/gender in patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, except for pediatric populations and cardiac arrest cases with traumatic cause, were included. The review included 80 articles on BCPR in men and women globally; 58 of these studies evaluated sex differences in BCPR outcomes. Fifty‐nine percent of the relevant studies (34/58) indicated that women are less likely recipients of BCPR, 36% (21/58) observed no significant sex differences, and 5% (3/58) reported that women are more likely to receive BCPR. In other studies, women were found to be less likely to receive BCPR in public but equally or more likely to receive BCPR in residential settings. The general reluctance to perform BCPR on women in the Western countries was attributed to perceived frailty of women, chest exposure, pregnancy, gender stereotypes, oversexualization of women's bodies, and belief that women are unlikely to experience a cardiac arrest. Most studies worldwide indicated that women were less likely to receive BCPR than men. Further research from non‐Western countries is needed to understand the impact of cultural and socioeconomic settings on such biases and design customized interventions accordingly.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3