Use of Palliative Care Among Adults With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure: Insights From a US National Insured Patient Sample

Author:

Zhang Zidong1ORCID,Subramaniam Divya S.12ORCID,Howard Steven W.3ORCID,Johnston Kenton J.4,Frick William H.5ORCID,Enard Kimberly6ORCID,Hinyard Leslie12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Advanced HEAlth Data (AHEAD) Institute, Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA

2. Department of Health & Clinical Outcomes Research Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA

3. University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL USA

4. Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA

5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA

6. Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice Saint Louis University St. Louis MO USA

Abstract

Background Despite the known benefits for individuals with heart failure (HF), incomplete data suggest a low use of palliative care (PC) for HF in the United States. We aimed to investigate the national PC use for adults with HF by determining when they received their first PC consultation (PCC) and the associations with clinical factors following diagnosis of HF. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a national all‐payer electronic health record database to identify adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed HF between 2011 and 2018. The proportion of those who received PCC within 5 years following a diagnosis of HF, and associations of time to first PCC with patient characteristics and HF‐specific clinical markers were determined. We followed 127 712 patients for a median of 792 days, of whom 18.3% received PCC in 5 years. Shorter time to receive PCC was associated with diagnoses of HF in 2016 to 2018 (compared with 2010–2015: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.421 [95% CI, 1.370–1.475]), advanced HF (aHR, 2.065 [95% CI, 1.940–2.198]), cardiogenic shock (aHR, 2.587 [95% CI, 2.414–2.773]), implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (aHR, 5.718 [95% CI, 5.327–6.138]), and visits at academic medical centers (aHR, 1.439 [95% CI, 1.381–1.500]). Conclusions Despite an expanded definition of PC and recommendations by professional societies, PC for HF remains low in the United States. Racial and geographic variations in access and use of PC exist for patients with HF. Future studies should interrogate the mechanisms of PC underusage, especially before advanced stages, and address barriers to PC services across the health care system.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3