Affiliation:
1. Division of Cardiology Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea
2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea
Abstract
Background
Data are still limited regarding whether there are differential long‐term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting (
CABG
) for left main coronary artery disease with or without diabetes mellitus (
DM
).
Methods and Results
Using the 10‐year data from the
MAIN
‐
COMPARE
(Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry, we sought to examine the effect of
DM
on comparative outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention or
CABG
in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. The outcomes of interest were all‐cause mortality; a composite of death, Q‐wave myocardial infarction, or stroke; and target‐vessel revascularization. The primary adjusted analyses were performed with the use of propensity scores and inverse‐probability weighting. Of 2240 patients with left main coronary artery revascularization, 722 (32%) had
DM
. In the overall population, the adjusted 10‐year risks of death and composite outcome were similar between percutaneous coronary intervention and
CABG
, irrespective of
DM
status (
P
interaction
: 0.41, mortality; 0.40, composite outcome). However, in the cohort of bare‐metal stents and concurrent
CABG
, we observed differential outcomes after stenting and
CABG
by
DM
status (
P
interaction
: 0.09, mortality; 0.04, composite outcome), favoring
CABG
in patients with DM. In the cohort of drug‐eluting stents and concurrent
CABG
, the better effect of
CABG
over stenting was narrowed in patients with DM without a significant interaction (
P
interaction
: 0.63, mortality; 0.47, composite outcome).
Conclusions
In this cohort of patients with longest follow‐up who underwent left main coronary artery revascularization, the clinical impact of
DM
favoring
CABG
over percutaneous coronary intervention has diminished over time from the bare‐metal stent to the drug‐eluting stent era.
Registration
URL
:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique identifier:
NCT
02791412.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献