Safety and Utility of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia

Author:

Scheel Paul J.1,Florido Roberta1,Hsu Steven1,Murray Brittney1,Tichnell Crystal1,James Cynthia A.1,Agafonova Julia1,Tandri Harikrishna1,Judge Daniel P.2,Russell Stuart D.3,Tedford Ryan J.2,Calkins Hugh1,Gilotra Nisha A.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD

2. Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC

3. Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC

Abstract

Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia ( ARVC /D) is characterized by high arrhythmic burden and progressive heart failure, which can prompt referral for heart transplantation. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing ( CPET ) has an established role in risk stratification for advanced heart failure therapies, but has not been described in ARVC /D. This study sought to determine the safety and prognostic utility of CPET in patients with ARVC /D. Methods and Results Using the Johns Hopkins ARVC /D Registry, we examined patients with ARVC /D undergoing CPET . Baseline characteristics and transplant‐free survival were compared on the basis of peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) (≤14 or >14 mL/kg per minute) and ventilatory efficiency (Ve/ VCO 2 slope ≤34 or >34). Thirty‐eight patients underwent 50 CPET s. There were no sustained arrhythmic events. Twenty‐nine patients achieved a maximal test. Patients with pVO2 ≤14 mL/kg per minute were more often men ( P =0.042) compared with patients with pVO2 >14 mL/kg per minute. Patients with Ve/ VCO 2 slope >34 tended to have more moderate/severe right ventricular dilation (7/9 [78%] versus 10/26 [38%]; P =0.060) and clinical heart failure (8/9 [89%] versus 13/26 [50%]; P =0.056) compared with patients with Ve/ VCO 2 slope ≤34. Patients who underwent heart transplantation were more likely to have clinical heart failure (10/10 [100%] versus 13/28 [46%]; P =0.003). Patients with Ve/ VCO 2 slope >34 had worse transplant‐free survival compared with patients with Ve/ VCO 2 slope ≤34 (n=35; hazard ratio, 6.57 [95% CI , 1.28–33.72]; log‐rank P =0.010), whereas transplant‐free survival was similar on the basis of pVO2 groups (n=29; hazard ratio, 3.38 [95% CI , 0.75–15.19]; log‐rank P =0.092). Conclusions CPET is safe to perform in patients with ARVC /D. Ve/ VCO 2 slope may be used for risk stratification and guide referral for heart transplantation in ARVC /D.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3