Differences in the Magnitude of Wave Reflection Account for Differential Effects of Amlodipine- Versus Atenolol-Based Regimens on Central Blood Pressure

Author:

Manisty Charlotte H.1,Zambanini Andrew1,Parker Kim H.1,Davies Justin E.1,Francis Darrel P.1,Mayet Jamil1,McG Thom Simon A.1,Hughes Alun D.1

Affiliation:

1. From the International Centre for Circulatory Health (C.H.M., A.Z., K.H.P., J.E.D., D.P.F., J.M., S.A.M.T., A.D.H.), National Heart and Lung Institute Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, UK; Department of Bioengineering (K.H.P.), Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Abstract

Antihypertensive agents may differ in their effects on central systolic blood pressure, and this may contribute to treatment-related differences in cardiovascular outcomes. In a substudy of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial, we investigated whether directly measured carotid systolic blood pressure differed between people randomized to amlodipine- and atenolol-based therapies and whether this is accounted for by differences in wave reflection patterns. Additional analysis was undertaken to establish whether differences in carotid systolic blood pressure predicted left ventricular mass, accounting for between-treatment differences in left ventricular mass index. Blood pressure and flow velocity were measured in the right carotid artery of 259 patients. Wave intensity analysis was used to separate and quantify forward and backward waves. Brachial blood pressure did not differ significantly between groups, but carotid systolic blood pressure (127 [12] versus 133 [15] mm Hg; P <0.001), the ratio of backward:forward pressure (0.48 [0.17] versus 0.53 [0.19]; P =0.01), and wave reflection index (19.8% [10.9%] versus 23.3% [13.3%]; P =0.02) were significantly lower in patients randomized to amlodipine-based therapy. Left ventricular mass index was also lower in this group, and adjustment for carotid blood pressure attenuated treatment differences to a greater extent than brachial blood pressure. Carotid systolic blood pressure was also a significant independent predictor of left ventricular mass index in a multivariate model. Carotid systolic blood pressure is lower in people randomized to amlodipine-based compared with atenolol-based treatment despite there being no significant difference in brachial blood pressure. This difference is attributable to a lesser magnitude of wave reflection in patients randomized to the amlodipine-based regimen.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Blood Pressure, Systolic and Diastolic, and Cardiovascular Risks

2. Nichols WW O'Rourke MF. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical Experimental and Clinical Principles. V ed. London United Kingdom: Hodder Arnold; 2005: 166–267.

3. Arterial Stiffness, Wave Reflections, and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease

4. Increased arterial wave reflections predict severe cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

Cited by 76 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3