Identifying Hemodynamic Determinants of Pulse Pressure

Author:

Vennin Samuel1,Li Ye1,Willemet Marie1,Fok Henry1,Gu Haotian1,Charlton Peter1,Alastruey Jordi1,Chowienczyk Phil1

Affiliation:

1. From the King’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacology (S.V., Y.L., H.F., H.G., P.C.) and Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering (S.V., Y.L., M.W., P.C., J.A.), King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

We examined the ability of a simple reduced model comprising a proximal characteristic impedance linked to a Windkessel element to accurately predict central pulse pressure (PP) from aortic blood flow, verified that parameters of the model corresponded to physical properties, and applied the model to examine PP dependence on cardiac and vascular properties. PP obtained from the reduced model was compared with theoretical values obtained in silico and measured values in vivo. Theoretical values were obtained using a distributed multisegment model in a population of virtual (computed) subjects in which cardiovascular properties were varied over the pathophysiological range. In vivo measurements were in normotensive subjects during modulation of physiology with vasoactive drugs and in hypertensive subjects. Central PP derived from the reduced model agreed with theoretical values (mean difference±SD, −0.09±1.96 mm Hg) and with measured values (mean differences −1.95±3.74 and −1.18±3.67 mm Hg for normotensive and hypertensive subjects, respectively). Parameters extracted from the reduced model agreed closely with theoretical and measured physical properties. Central PP was seen to be determined mainly by total arterial compliance (inversely associated with central arterial stiffness) and ventricular dynamics: the blood volume ejected by the ventricle into the aorta up to time of peak pressure and blood flow into the aorta (corresponding to the rate of ventricular ejection) up to this time point. Increased flow and volume accounted for 20.1 mm Hg (52%) of the 39.0 mm Hg difference in PP between the upper and lower tertiles of the hypertensive subjects.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3