Prevention of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction by Amlodipine and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers

Author:

Wang Ji-Guang1,Li Yan1,Franklin Stanley S.1,Safar Michel1

Affiliation:

1. From the Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials (J.G.W., Y.L.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Preventive Cardiology Program (S.S.F.), University of California, Irvine; and the Diagnosis Center (M.S.), Hopital Hotel-Dieu, Paris, France.

Abstract

In the present quantitative overview of outcome trials, we investigated the efficacy of amlodipine or angiotensin receptor blockers in the prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, or diabetic nephropathy. The analysis included 12 trials of 94 338 patients. The analysis of trials involving an amlodipine group showed that amlodipine provided more protection against stroke and myocardial infarction than other antihypertensive drugs, including angiotensin receptor blockers (−19%, P <0.0001 and −7%, P =0.03) and placebo (−37%, P =0.06 and −29%, P =0.04). The analysis of trials involving an angiotensin receptor blocker group showed contrasting results between trials versus amlodipine and trials versus other antihypertensive drugs for stroke (+19% versus −25%; P <0.0001) and myocardial infarction (+21% versus +1%; P =0.03). The results of 3 trials comparing an angiotensin receptor blocker with placebo were neutral ( P ≥0.14). The within-trial between-group difference in achieved systolic pressure ranged from −1.1 to +4.7 mm Hg for trials involving an amlodipine group and from −2.8 to +4.0 mm Hg for trials involving an angiotensin receptor blocker group. The metaregression analysis correlating odds ratios with blood pressure differences showed a negative relationship (regression coefficients: −3% to −8%), which reached statistical significance (regression coefficient: −6%; P =0.01) for stroke in trials involving an amlodipine group. In conclusion, blood pressure differences largely accounted for cardiovascular outcome.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3