Treatment Patterns and Blood Pressure Control With Initiation of Combination Versus Monotherapy Antihypertensive Regimens

Author:

An Jaejin1ORCID,Luong Tiffany1ORCID,Qian Lei1,Wei Rong1ORCID,Liu Ran1,Muntner Paul2ORCID,Brettler Jeffrey3,Jaffe Marc G.4,Moran Andrew E.56,Reynolds Kristi17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. From the Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (J.A., T.L., L.Q., R.W., R.L., K.R.)

2. University of Alabama at Birmingham (P.M.)

3. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles (J.B.)

4. The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA (M.G.J.)

5. Resolve to Save Lives, an Initiative of Vital Strategies, New York City (A.E.M.)

6. Division of General Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City (A.E.M.)

7. Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (K.R.).

Abstract

Many patients with hypertension require 2 or more drug classes to achieve their blood pressure (BP) goal. We compared antihypertensive medication treatment patterns and BP control between patients who initiated combination therapy versus monotherapy. We identified adults with hypertension enrolled in a US integrated healthcare system who initiated antihypertensive medication between 2008 and 2014. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antihypertensive medication, and BP were extracted from electronic health records. Antihypertensive medication patterns and multivariable adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of achieving the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline-recommended BP <130/80 mm Hg were evaluated for 2 years following treatment initiation. Of 135 971 patients, 43% initiated antihypertensive combination therapy (35% ACE [angiotensin converting enzyme] inhibitor (ACEI)-thiazide diuretics; 8% with other combinations) and 57% initiated monotherapy (22% ACEIs; 16% thiazide diuretics; 11% β blockers; 8% calcium channel blockers). After multivariable adjustment including premedication BP levels, patients who initiated ACEI-thiazide diuretic combination therapy were more likely to achieve BP <130/80 mm Hg compared with their counterparts who initiated monotherapy with ACEI (PR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.08–1.12]), thiazide diuretic (PR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.18–1.24]), β blocker (PR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.14–1.20]), or calcium channel blocker (PR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.22–1.29]). Compared with initiating monotherapy, patients initiating ACEI-thiazide diuretic combination therapy were more likely to achieve BP goals.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3